News / USA

US Supreme Court OKs Obama's Health Care Plan

Supporters of the Affordable Healthcare Act gather in front of the Supreme Court before the court's announcement of the legality of the law in Washington, June 28, 2012.
Supporters of the Affordable Healthcare Act gather in front of the Supreme Court before the court's announcement of the legality of the law in Washington, June 28, 2012.
VOA News
The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Barack Obama a major victory Thursday, upholding the key part of his controversial health care plan in a 5-4 decision.

The so-called "individual mandate" requires Americans to have health insurance or face a financial penalty.  U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's more liberal justices, writing in his majority opinion that "because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not [the court's] role to forbid it, or to pass [decide] upon its wisdom or fairness.''

Facts About The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as “Obamacare”

  • Individual mandate requiring all U.S. citizens to have health insurance either through private companies, their employers, or state-sponsored exchanges. Failure to do so will result in a fine.
  • Insurance companies banned from denying coverage to applicants with pre-existing health conditions.
  • Insurance companies required to include preventative health care at no extra cost, banned from setting limits on payouts for coverage.
  • Companies employing over 50 people required to provide those employees with health insurance.
  • Children allowed to stay on their parents’ insurance plans until 26 years of age. 
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor voted with Roberts to uphold the law.

President Barack Obama hailed the ruling as a victory "for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure because of this law and the Supreme Court's decision to uphold it."  He also said the court decision reaffirmed that in the United States, the wealthiest nation on Earth, no illness or accident should lead any family to financial ruin.

"Whatever the politics, today's decision was a victory for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure because of this law and the Supreme Court's decision to uphold it," said President Obama.

Mr. Obama's expected challenger in the 2012 election, Republican Mitt Romney, promised to repeal the law on his first day in office, if elected.  He said "Obamacare was bad policy yesterday.  It's bad policy today," and warned the law will cause up to 20 million Americans to lose health care coverage they like or want to keep while also killing badly needed jobs.

"What the court did today was say that Obamacare did not violate the Constitution," said Romney. "What they did not do is say that Obamacare was good law or that it's good policy.  Obamacare was bad policy yesterday.  It's bad policy today."

Related video report by Suzanne Presto

US Supreme Court Upholds Health Care Acti
|| 0:00:00
X
June 29, 2012 12:28 AM
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Affordable Care Act, a key domestic policy achievement of President Obama, is constitutional. In part, the act requires insurance companies to include preventative health care, and it bans them from denying coverage to people with pre-existing health conditions. The act also requires virtually all Americans to have some form of health insurance. VOA's Suzanne Presto in Washington has more.
The Obama administration had argued the "individual mandate" is valid under the U.S. Constitution because all Americans will need medical care at some point in their lives, and there is no practical alternative to insurance.

Twenty-six states filed suit against the reform law, contending that individuals cannot be forced to buy insurance, a product they may neither want nor need.
 
Republican lawmakers were quick to respond to the court decision, using it to launch a renewed effort to repeal the law in its entirety.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, John Boehner, told reporters the court's ruling underscored the urgency to act.

He said, "There's a lot of resolve amongst our colleagues and amongst the American people to stop a law that's hurting our economy, driving up the cost of health care and making it more difficult for employers to hire new workers."  

U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell also lashed out at the law, saying it "made the problems it was meant to solve even worse - the supposed cure has proven to be worse than the disease."

The U.S. business community is also speaking out.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said his pro-business group still feels the health care law is fundamentally flawed.  If left unchanged, he said, "it will cost many Americans their employer-based health insurance, undermine job creation, and raise health care costs for all."

Still, the president's supporters applauded the ruling, hoping it will help lead to Democratic victories in the upcoming election.

The top Democrat in the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, called the court ruling a victory for the American people because it "ensured health care would be a right for all, not a privilege for the few."

Thursday's decision drew a large and energetic crowd to the steps of the Supreme Court, with students, parents, priests and even some belly dancers anxiously awaiting the decision.  But the ruling - a complex look at the constitutionality of the Obama health care law - sparked confusion.  Many in the crowd - and some in the news media - were at first not clear about what the decision meant.

The law passed in early 2010 is the signature piece of President Obama's legislative agenda during his time in office.  It is intended to address rising health care costs and the financial problems many Americans have faced in trying to obtain health insurance.

  • Demonstrators celebrate outside the Supreme Court after the court's ruling on health care, June 28, 2012.
  • U.S. President Barack Obama makes a statement in the East Room of the White House in Washington about the Supreme Court's decision on his Administration's health care law.
  • Claire McAndrew and Donny Kirsch, both of Washington, celebrate after the court's ruling.
  • Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks about the Supreme Court's health care ruling in Washington. "As you might imagine, I disagree with the Supreme Court's decision and I agree with the dissent," he said.
  • House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi relays the breaking news to her staff on Capitol Hill in Washington.
  • Supporters of the Affordable Healthcare Act celebrate in front of the Supreme Court after the court upheld the legality of the law.
  • Supporters gathered in front of the Supreme Court before the court's announcement.
  • Tea Party supporter William Temple protests against President Barack Obama's 2010 health care overhaul outside the Supreme Court.
  • Protesters' shadows are cast outside the Supreme Court.

You May Like

Video Five Patients Given Experimental Ebola Drug Said To Be Improving

Experimental drugs have been tried on six people: three Westerners and now, three African pyhysicians More

Video In Ukraine, Fear and Distrust Remain Where Fighting has Stopped

As Ukrainian military reclaims control of eastern cities residents rebuild their lives, but many say everyone is being treated with suspicion More

Video In Rural Kenya, Pressure Builds Against Female Circumcision

Girls learn to object; FGM practitioners face penalties from jail sentences to stiff fines More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 3
 Previous   Next 
by: jayburd2020 from: Chicago
June 28, 2012 6:15 PM
Good news for supporters of Obamacare, but am I the only one not surprised the Court shied away from ruling on the constitutionality of man-dates? Must be waiting for a good same-sex marriage case. For 5 "Supreme" jokes on the Court and the Beltway, enjoy this blog on ChicagoNow.com: http://bit.ly/LTgVfZ


by: Learn To Read from: USA
June 28, 2012 5:22 PM
I know this is just a comment amongst thousands... but PLEASE understand what this bill does... It doesn't provide anything, it taxes you if you don't purchase something. So what happens to those poor souls who can't afford health care? They are hit with a tax or a large monthly bill now. HOORAY! We have saved the day!... Please learn to read things before you support them.

To claim to be republican or democrat is foolish. The only way we can make this country great is to educate ourselves and vote individually on candidates. Continuing to vote on one party is a waste of a vote.


by: Disgusted from: TX
June 28, 2012 5:08 PM
Recently Chief Justice Roberts has upheld liberal programs in immigration and now healthcare. Conservative? Not any more,. I'd like to know what they have on him because I do not believe any reasonable interpretation of the law would allow this ruling. Heads up America. You will be taxed into oblivion causing us to become a 3rd world country. SO FED UP!


by: Idle from: New York
June 28, 2012 4:20 PM
its like sombody was on motorcycle without wearing helmet got pulled over and got ticket , other side cop stop man on sidewalk was walking and wearing helmet and give him ticket coz he was wearing helmet and he dont have motorcyle


by: Andreifonov from: Russia
June 28, 2012 4:14 PM
The battle for health seems to be most important in this story, so the U.S. Supreme Court decision has important significance. Interestingly, in 26 Republican state representatives of the Democratic Party, since the entry into force of this "Bill of Health" from 2014 can be used in favor of Barack Obama this circumstance. So, B. Obama wins here.
If only technically, the voter will receive payment for treating 32 million people, and strass campaign - the new flow of funds. As a complement, the U.S. will begin to develop the medical industry and innovation. This will improve the rating of President.


by: Shawn from: Colorado
June 28, 2012 4:07 PM
I forsee WAY too many issues with this. The government takes seconds to charge you for something, but takes MONTHS or YEARS to get a refund.

What about if I have insurance and they charge me anyway?
Or how about the stinking, lying, greedy illegals crossing the border getting free s***? We ever gonna do something about that? They get free healthcare, but I am forced to either buy my own or get charged for an unknown policy? Yeah. I'm loving this country more every day....


by: Joe from: TN
June 28, 2012 3:04 PM
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark on their right hand, or on their foreheads: and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred threescore six. - Rev.13:16-18

In Response

by: Mae from: PA
June 29, 2012 12:27 PM
Well quoted! This is what it's coming too.


by: Tracy
June 28, 2012 2:51 PM
I think this article forgot to mention one important fact. Its not just "Making people buy insurance" its prohibiting insurers from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions and its also allowing parents to keep their children on family policies to the age of 26.


by: Winsor from: Florida
June 28, 2012 1:51 PM
@ Fred that's Funny.. I think president Obama has a good chance to win November election because everything is going in his favor.


by: annonomous from: la
June 28, 2012 1:51 PM
I will not follow this man bringing this country straight to hell.

In Response

by: Steven from: Maryland
June 28, 2012 5:15 PM
Yes you will... you're weak, you have no voice. I love Obama, I'm voting for him in the next election.

In Response

by: annonomous from: flint
June 28, 2012 4:19 PM
this country was already on its way to hell before obama was ever in office. You got bush to thank for that, so get your facts straight as#hole.

Comments page of 3
 Previous   Next 

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Five Patients Given Experimental Ebola Drug Said to Be Improvingi
X
Carol Pearson
August 19, 2014 11:43 PM
The World Health Organization has approved the use of experimental treatments for Ebola patients in West Africa. The Ebola outbreak there is unprecedented, the disease deadly. The number of people who have died from Ebola has surpassed 1,200. VOA's Carol Pearson reports on the ethical considerations of allowing experimental drugs to be used.
Video

Video Five Patients Given Experimental Ebola Drug Said to Be Improving

The World Health Organization has approved the use of experimental treatments for Ebola patients in West Africa. The Ebola outbreak there is unprecedented, the disease deadly. The number of people who have died from Ebola has surpassed 1,200. VOA's Carol Pearson reports on the ethical considerations of allowing experimental drugs to be used.
Video

Video In Ukraine, Fear and Distrust Remain Where Fighting has Stopped

As the Ukrainian military reclaims control of eastern cities from pro-Russian separatists, residents are getting a chance to rebuild their lives. VOA's Gabe Joselow reports from the town of Kramatorsk in Donetsk province, where a sense of fear is still in the air, and distrust of the government in Kyiv still runs deep.
Video

Video China Targets Overseas Assets of Corrupt Officials

As China presses forward with its anti-graft effort, authorities are targeting corrupt officials who have sent family members and assets overseas. The efforts have stirred up a debate at home on exactly how many officials take that route and how likely it is they will be caught. Rebecca Valli has this report.
Video

Video Leading The Fight Against Islamic State, Kurds Question Iraqi Future

Western countries including the United States have begun arming the Kurdish Peshmerga forces in northern Iraq to aid their battle against extremist Sunni militants from the Islamic State. But there are concerns that a heavily-armed Kurdistan Regional Government, or KRG, might seek to declare independence and cause the break-up of the Iraqi state. As Henry Ridgwell reports from London, the KRG says it will only seek greater autonomy from Baghdad.
Video

Video In Rural Kenya, Pressure Builds Against Female Circumcision

In some Kenyan communities, female genital mutilation remains a rite of passage. But activists are pushing back, with education for girls and with threats of punishment those who perform the circumcision. Mohammed Yusuf looks at the practice in the rural eastern community of Tharaka-Nithi.
Video

Video For Obama, Racial Violence is Personal Issue

The racial violence in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson is presenting U.S. President Barack Obama with an issue to which he has a deep personal connection. To many Americans, Obama's election as America's first black president marked a turning point in race relations in the United States, and Obama has made ending the violence a policy priority. On Monday he issued a new call for calm and understanding. Luis Ramirez reports from the White House.
Video

Video Clinton-Obama Relationship Could Impact 2016 Election

President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have a long and complicated relationship. That relationship took another turn recently when Clinton criticized the president’s foreign policy. VOA National Correspondent Jim Malone reports there is renewed attention on the Clinton-Obama relationship as Hillary Clinton considers running for
Video

Video Iran Looks to Maintain Influence in Baghdad With New Shia PM

Washington and Tehran share the goal of stopping Syrian-based militants in Iraq. But experts say it's Iran, not the United States, that will most influence how the new government in Baghdad approaches internal reforms and the war in Syria. VOA State Department Correspondent Scott Stearns has the story.

AppleAndroid