News / Africa

Liberian Lawmaker to Vote 'No' in Constitutional Referendum

Jewel Howard Taylor, wife of former president Charles Taylor, says the clause on residency requirement for presidential candidates is discriminatory

Multimedia

Audio
TEXT SIZE - +
James Butty

With less than a week to go before Tuesday’s constitutional referendum in Liberia, a well-known member of the legislature says she plans to vote “No” on all four amendments.

Liberians will decide whether to amend Article 52 (c) reducing the residency requirement for presidential candidates from 10 to 5 years, Article 72 (b), which seeks to increase the retirement age of judges from 70 to 75 years and Article 83 (a), which seeks to change the election date from October to November.

Senator Jewel Howard Taylor, wife of former President Charles Taylor, who is also chair of the Senate Electoral Committee, calls the referendum ballot confusing.

“If you look at the ballot for Proposition 1, that talks about the five-year clause, it says five years 'Yes,' and where the 'No' box is, it says 10 years. I thought it should have read five years 'Yes' or 'No' because the issue is not on the law, the issue is on changes that we need to make,” she said.

Liberia Electoral Commission Chairman James Fromayan
Liberia Electoral Commission Chairman James Fromayan

Officials at the National Elections Commission have said the ballot is not confusing. According to local media reports, the commission posted sample ballot papers in public places around the country to educate voters.

Taylor says, when she first saw the sample ballot, she felt it was intended to benefit proponents of the referendum.  But, she says the commission has provided additional explanation.

“When I saw it, that’s how I felt.  However, over the last few days, they [the elections commission] have said that if you vote 'No' and if you check the 'No' box it would mean 'No' to the propositions.  So, I guess they must ignore the fact that on top of the boxes on all of the four propositions you actually have the law. So, if someone were to say 'No' to the one year clause which is on top of the 'No' box, you would saying 'No,'” Taylor said.

She says she plans to vote “No” on all four amendments.

“The first one is the proposition that says we should change the law from 10 years to a five-year period.  I think that law is discriminatory because it eliminates Liberians who might have come home in the last couple of years to get involved in the process,” Taylor said.

Taylor says she also plans to vote “No” on Article 72 (b), which seeks to increase the retirement age of judges from 70 to 75 years, because she says Liberia needs new blood in its judicial system.

You May Like

Pakistan Reiterates Opposition to US Drone Strikes

Day earlier US President Barack Obama justified 'constrained' drone usage to save lives More

Study Identifies Risks of Human Spread of H7N9 Bird Flu

Study suggest that international measures to contain the H7N9 influenza, in the event of severe outbreak, will need to be targeted in Asia More

Violence Continues in Conakry Over Upcoming Elections

Opposition has called for boycott of elections More

Video Syria's Civil War Fuels Violence in Iraq

Analysts say al-Qaida-linked militants are flowing back and forth from both countries More

Video Star Trek Influence Lives Long and Prospers

As new movie thrills, many are once again discussing the iconic franchise's influence on society, science and technology More

OECD: Developing Green Cities Key to Sustainable Future

OECD suggests strategies to mitigate rapid growth, industrialization in urban centers, which produce about two-thirds of greenhouse gas emissions More

This forum has been closed.
Comments
     
There are no comments in this forum. Be first and add one

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video Volunteers Help Revive LA's Concrete River

The Los Angeles River is a concrete drainage channel through much of its 80-kilometer length. It channels waste-water from storm drains and has become a receptacle for much of the city's trash. But as Mike O'Sullivan reports, the river is slowly being restored with the help of volunteers, who take part in an annual clean-up.