News / Asia

North Korea Vows New Nuclear Test 'Aimed' at US

Punggye-ri, North Korea nuclear test sitePunggye-ri, North Korea nuclear test site
x
Punggye-ri, North Korea nuclear test site
Punggye-ri, North Korea nuclear test site
TEXT SIZE - +

Steve Herman

A veteran journalist in Asia, Steven L Herman is the Voice of America bureau chief and correspondent based in Seoul.

You May Like

Video NASA Introduces New Astronaut Candidates

NASA says half appointees are women, making this highest percentage of female astronauts in one class More

Singapore, Malaysia Choke as Illegal Indonesia Forest Fires Rage

Illegal clearing of forests by burning is a recurrent problem, particularly during annual dry season that stretches from June to September More

Scandals Hit Obama's Standing With US Voters

Obama's approval rating fell eight percentage points over past month to 45 percent More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
 Previous    
by: Guest Response from: Wisconsin
January 24, 2013 7:38 AM
Note the use of "sworn enemy". Wouldn't it be better if they are forcibly denied the development of nuclear weapons? Do you think that maybe they have sworn vows to retake south korea in time?

In Response

by: iamhe from: New Haven CT
January 24, 2013 12:14 PM
I think you have fallen victim to a misunderstanding concerning the use of "sworn enemy"

From NK's point of view.. try to understand, the US has officially declared -sworn- that NK is an enemy state.

Given under oath: "a sworn statement" and determined to remain in the role of a sworn enemy. Having been asserted as true under oath: sworn statements by a sworn official. Avowed: a sworn enemy.

Making such statements, and holding such positions is sure to make NK react in an unfavorable way...

A sure fire way to make enemies, and set the stage for highly profitable US war budgets..


by: iamhe from: New Haven CT
January 24, 2013 7:29 AM
I am sorry to have to say that the way in which the US frames this and handles North Korea is all wrong, and unnecessarily provocative and dangerous...
And it does look like, and for a long time now, that the UN is controlled by the US.. The UN has never stood up against the US when it should have... hind sight shows that the UN should have stood up to the US on a number of international issues.. I sincerely believe I could do a better job in managing US relations with nuclearized North Korea, and Iran...

In Response

by: THARN
January 24, 2013 11:16 PM
Sorry to say The U.N. hasn't stood up to anyone or actually put focus on helping people under brutal regimes- The U.N. is a farce and needs to be dismantled.


by: ben from: uk
January 24, 2013 6:37 AM
no where does it mention "aimed" at anyone, quit scare mongering

In Response

by: S from: UK
January 24, 2013 3:06 PM
Maybe you could learn to spell before you tell someone to learn to read?

In Response

by: Rick Rife from: United Staes Of America
January 24, 2013 2:23 PM
learn how to read. it stated that it was aimed at the United States, their srown enemy. love it or leave


by: x4livin from: Texas
January 24, 2013 5:57 AM
Why are we sending money to our "sworn enemy"?

In Response

by: soshaljustic from: NV
January 24, 2013 1:11 PM
Because people in poverty need to eat and it is the clearest path to making a sworn friend. There is no need to squash a poor peoples with an overgrowth of egoistic short and bad hair leaders. The citizen people cannot help they have ignorance leading the way within a totalitarian state that would murder them if they speak out or do anything to rise up. At least some of the food trickles down to the people from the "sworn enemy" that is us.

Comments page of 2
 Previous    

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video Egyptian Support for Syrian Opposition is Words Over Action

Egypt has further aligned itself with those trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But as VOA's Elizabeth Arrott reports from Cairo, it remains unclear how far Egypt will back its words with action.