News / USA

Petraeus: NATO, Afghan, Pakistani Forces to Coordinate More Operations

Gen. David Petraeus, left, top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, meets US marines during his visit to Marjah, Afghanistan, 25 Dec 2010
TEXT SIZE - +

The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan says NATO, Afghan and Pakistani forces will conduct more coordinated operations against Taliban insurgents on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border.

In an interview with the Associated Press on Saturday, General David Petraeus said forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan have operated in "very close coordination in the past two months." He said the security forces of both countries will have more opportunities to coordinate with U.S.-led NATO troops "as earlier gains are solidified."

Petraeus also praised Pakistan for its counter-insurgency efforts in the past two years in areas near the Afghan border where the Taliban and other militants seek shelter. He said Pakistani forces have conducted "impressive" operations in the Swat Valley, the North West Frontier Province and northwestern tribal regions.

The United States has long pressed Pakistan to clear those regions of insurgents who cross into Afghanistan to attack U.S.-led NATO forces. The pressure often has strained U.S.-Pakistani relations, with Islamabad bristling at suggestions that it should do more.

Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani also criticized the U.S. practice of using drones to attack militants in Pakistani tribal regions. Speaking in the city of Multan Sunday, Mr. Gilani said the drone strikes are increasing Pakistan's problems. He also called for drone technology to be provided to Pakistani forces.

U.S. drones have carried out frequent attacks on militants in Pakistani border areas, but the strikes also have killed and wounded Pakistani civilians and stirred anger in Pakistani society.

The Afghan government also criticized U.S.-led NATO forces Sunday, accusing them of violating security rules by raiding a Kabul office building last Friday and killing two Afghan security guards. The Afghan interior ministry said Sunday NATO troops ignored a 2008 agreement that put Afghan authorities in charge of security operations in the capital.

NATO says coalition troops raided the building in coordination with Afghan security forces, in response to a "credible threat" to attack the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. It says intelligence indicated two vehicles loaded with explosives were parked there.

NATO says coalition troops came under fire while searching the building and shot back, killing two gunmen and detaining a third.

Afghan interior ministry spokesman Zemarai Bashary described the incident as "tragic." He said authorities have suspended an Afghan police general who cooperated with NATO forces in the raid.    

Some information for this report was provided by AP and AFP.

NEW: Follow our Middle East reports on Twitter
and discuss them on our Facebook page.

You May Like

Video Egypt's Conservative Rural Vote Appears Split

Early speculation after the first two-day round is showing a race too close to call More

NATO Continues Plans for Missile Defense

While Afghanistan dominated talks in Chicago, member states also reaffirmed their commitment to ballistic-missile defense More

War Declared on Invasive Leaping Asian Carp

When Asian carp were first imported decades ago, few foresaw their environmental impact. More

This forum has been closed.
Comments
     
There are no comments in this forum. Be first and add one
The Student Union

It’s Not Too Late To Get Admission for the Fall

More

An ‘A’ Won’t Get You a Career, But a Good Education Might

More

Here’s Exactly What a College Application Form Looks Like

More

Travel Tips for International Students in America

More

Events for International Students: May 21-25

More
Read more
Ted Landphair

The Golden Gate Bridge — A Diamond Over the Rough

More

The Empire State Building: No. 2 in New York, 1 in Our Hearts

More

On California’s Royal Road, Traces of ‘New Spain’

More

Heart of the Heartland

More

So You Want to be Famous!

More
Read more