News / Africa

South Sudan Opposition Leader Calls Deal 'Pie Shell' Agreement

South Sudan President Salva Kiir and Sudan President Omar al-Bashir take part in signing ceremony in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. South Sudan President Salva Kiir and Sudan President Omar al-Bashir take part in signing ceremony in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
x
South Sudan President Salva Kiir and Sudan President Omar al-Bashir take part in signing ceremony in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
South Sudan President Salva Kiir and Sudan President Omar al-Bashir take part in signing ceremony in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
TEXT SIZE - +
Charlton Doki
The minority leader in South Sudan’s parliament, Onyoti Adigo Nyikwac, is embracing the deal announced Thursday between Sudan and South Sudan.

Nyikwac said it will build the trust and confidence that the two parties badly need in order to resolve remaining issues. But at the same time, he urged the ruling parties in Juba and Khartoum to include opposition parties in future talks, asserting that those unresolved issues will affect all South Sudanese people.
 
“The agreement is a step forward although it is a pie shell agreement," Nyikwac said. "My concern is the implementation of the agreements.”
 
The agreements focus on a new, demilitarized buffer zone and oil production.  But the two sides made no progress on the disputed Abyei region located along the border of Sudan and South Sudan. And no accord was reached on oil-rich Heglig, over which the two sides clashed in April.
 
Nyikwac said the two issues left unresolved are key to a lasting peace.
 
“The borders issue and the Abyei issue [are] paramount, but what is most important is political commitment,” Nyikwac said. “The NCP [National Congress Party] and the SPLM [Sudanese People's Liberation Movement] were bitter enemies at the negotiations, but if they would have involved other political parties - because these are election issues - we would have been cheered by all the people.”
 
For example, Nyikwac said, South Sudan has offered Sudan $3.3 billion over two years for compensation in lost oil revenue. He argued that the opposition parties would have “raised South Sudan up,” by building schools, by providing good services, and making hydroelectric power.
 
“I think that is a very big amount of money,” Nyikwac said.
 
But Nyikwac acknowledges that South Sudan had to sign an agreement with Sudan in order to right its economy. He said they also signed a deal because of pressure from the international community, noting that if they did not, both Sudan and South Sudan faced sanctions.
 
“It is in favor of two countries to agree so that oil can start flowing again so that it will better their economic situations,” Nyikwac said.

South Sudan Parliament Minority Leader Onyoti Adigo Nyikwac with Charlton Doki
Loading
12:00:00 / -:--:--

You May Like

Experts Weigh In on Challenges of Closing Guantanamo Prison

Former chief military prosecutor at Guantanamo delivers petition to White House with more than 370,000 signatures, demanding facility be closed down immediately More

Karzai to Discuss Enhancing Defense Ties with India

Afghanistan looking for more military aid as it prepares for withdrawal of NATO forces by next year More

India, China Pledge to Overcome Border Tensions

Indian prime minister and Chinese premier attempt to move past tense standoff in the Himalayas during Delhi talks More

Burmese President Opens US Visit with VOA Town Hall Meeting

Ahead of his meeting with President Obama Monday, Thein Sein answered questions on human rights and economic development in his country More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Arok Macur Thon Arok from: Juba, South Sudan
September 28, 2012 12:02 PM
I think the two sides did not do anything they left the key problems and singed to please the UN and others . But there is still problems this is not the end.

In Response

by: nizar from: sudan
October 01, 2012 2:51 PM
Mr arock let us know what is the key problem that the tow opposition group do not touch ..i think the desire in peace process will pave the way to over come the other problem let us try

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video US Oil Surge Could Impact Mideast Geopolitics

The United States will account for a third of new oil supplies over the next five years, and will become energy self-sufficient in 20 years, according to a new report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA). Although U.S. oil imports from Arab Gulf countries increased last year, analysts predict the U.S. will lose its dependence on Middle East imports, which is expected to have a huge impact on international relations and the balance of power. VOA's Henry Ridgewell reports.