News / USA

White House Defends Obama Budget

In this photo released by CBS News, White house Chief of Staff Jacob Lew talks on CBS's Face the Nation in Washington Sunday, Feb. 12, 2012.
TEXT SIZE - +
Michael Bowman

As President Barack Obama prepares to unveil his blueprint for U.S. government spending, White House officials are already defending the document from Republican attack. The Obama budget, to be released later Monday, is expected to call for a mix of spending restraint and tax hikes to shrink the runaway U.S. deficit during the next decade.

President Obama has long urged what he calls a “balanced approach” of higher taxes and lower spending to fix America’s fiscal woes. He has urged immediate measures to stimulate the economy combined with long-term budgetary restraint.  

White House Chief of Staff Jacob Lew says the president’s new budget reflects those priorities.

“The president’s budget is a plan for 10 years. In the short term we need to keep the economy growing, and in the long term we need to get the deficit under control in a way that builds an economy that can last for the future, where we build a manufacturing base, we have Americans with the skills to do the work of the future.”

Lew, who until recently served as Obama’s top budget official, made the remarks in a U.S. television interview.

Early reports say the president’s budget would raise taxes on top earners and force investors to pay similar tax rates on stock market profits as ordinary Americans pay on their wages and salaries. At the same time, the Obama budget would reportedly boost funding for U.S. infrastructure, unemployment benefits, and federal assistance to revenue-strapped states.

Addressing a Washington gathering of conservative political leaders and activists last week, the Budget Committee chairman in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, Paul Ryan, dismissed the White House budget blueprint as a continuation of failed and counter-productive Democratic policies.

“His proposals have three things in common: they load massive tax increases on small businesses and hardworking families, they require bureaucratic rationing in government health care programs, and they hollow out our national security.”

Not so, according to Jacob Lew.

“If you look at our budget, for every dollar of [new] revenue, there are two-and-a-half dollars of spending reductions.  So I think it is clearly not the case that this is a budget based on just raising taxes. But we [currently] have tax cuts that go to people who do not need them. We have tax cuts going to the wealthiest people in America, who are going to have to pay their fair share.”

In the first year of his administration, President Obama pledged to cut the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term.  The deficit exceeded $1 trillion in 2009 and, according to White House projections, is expected to do so again this year.

You May Like

China Pushes Back on US Criticism of Human Rights

China has long rejected outside criticism of human rights abuses as interference in its internal affairs More

Some Accuse US of Hypocrisy Over Pakistan Doctor Case

They cite US prison sentence against man who spied for Israel More

'Outrage' Over US Prostate Cancer Testing Recommendation

New federal task force recommendation to cease routine prostate-cancer screening tests is stirring up controversy in the medical community More

This forum has been closed.
Comments
     
There are no comments in this forum. Be first and add one
The Student Union

International Students and US Employment

More

It’s Not Too Late To Get Admission for the Fall

More

An ‘A’ Won’t Get You a Career, But a Good Education Might

More

Here’s Exactly What a College Application Form Looks Like

More

Travel Tips for International Students in America

More
Read more
Ted Landphair

The Golden Gate Bridge — A Diamond Over the Rough

More

The Empire State Building: No. 2 in New York, 1 in Our Hearts

More

On California’s Royal Road, Traces of ‘New Spain’

More

Heart of the Heartland

More

So You Want to be Famous!

More
Read more