Text Only
Search

 
US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Ten Commandments


28 February 2005
Malone report (Real Player) - Download 351k - Download (Real) audio clip
Malone report (Real Player) - Download 351k - Listen (Real) audio clip

The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether displaying the Ten Commandments on government property violates the constitutional ban against official endorsement of religion. The high court will hear oral arguments in two cases Wednesday.

At issue are public displays of the Ten Commandments in Texas and Kentucky. The Texas monument has been outside the state capitol in Austin since 1961 while the Kentucky case involves framed copies of the Ten Commandments that were placed on the walls of two courthouses in 1999.

Critics of the displays say they violate the constitutional prohibitions against the government endorsing religion.

According to Jewish and Christian holy books the Ten Commandments were laws given to Moses by God.

Douglas Laycock, a professor at the University of Texas Law School, argues that the Ten Commandments primarily represent religious symbolism and should not be prominently displayed on government property.

"[It] begins with, 'I am the Lord, thy God', and then says, 'Thou shalt have no other Gods before me, thou shalt not have any graven images.' That does not sound like law," said Professor Laycock. "That sounds like religion. The first half of the [Ten] Commandments really have no secular equivalents. They are purely and entirely about one's duties toward God."

Supporters of publicly displaying the Ten Commandments, including the Bush administration, have a different view. They contend that the Commandments symbolize the Judeo-Christian roots that form the foundation of modern legal principles.

Jay Sekulow, who is with the American Center for Law and Justice, a law firm that frequently represents conservative Christian activists, argues that most Americans have already accepted displays of the Ten Commandments in or near numerous government buildings around the country, including the Supreme Court itself.

"Why is it there? It is because it is a universal symbol of law," he said. "And the Supreme Court has to be careful when it issues its opinions to leave room not only for its own display, but for the tens of thousands of displays in courthouses, county facilities throughout the United States."

Supporters also argue that the displays of the Ten Commandments are not intrusive for non-believers since people can simply avert their eyes or walk away.

Legal experts say the key question for the Supreme Court is whether the displays at public buildings constitute government endorsement of religion, which is banned under the constitutional mandate separating church and state.

The court is expected to rule on the issue by the end of June.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Top Story
G-7 Nations Agree on Financial Action Plan  Audio Clip Available

  More Stories
US, India Sign Civilian Nuclear Accord  Audio Clip Available
Suicide Bomber Kills at Least 30 in Pakistan's Northwest  Audio Clip Available
Obama Responds To McCain Character Attacks  Audio Clip Available
NATO to Target Opium Network Funding Taliban  Audio Clip Available
Russian Troops Withdraw from Georgia, But Is It Enough?  Audio Clip Available
Rice in Top-Level Consultations on North Korean Nuclear Impasse
19 Killed in Southern Peru Suspected Shining Path Attack
Asia's Markets Follow Wall Street With Panic Selling  Audio Clip Available
Obama, McCain Stress Bad Economy
Former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari Wins Nobel Peace Prize  Audio Clip Available
Turkish Air Strikes Target Kurdish Rebels in Iraq
Petraeus: Serious Ethnic Challenges Loom in Iraq  Video clip available
Israeli Police Deploy in Coastal Town After Jewish-Arab Clashes  Audio Clip Available
South Korea Says North's Nuclear Compromise May Be Near  Audio Clip Available
Financial Crisis Not Changing West African Desire to Migrate to US  Audio Clip Available
Nigerian Oil Workers to Strike  Audio Clip Available
As Election Day Approaches, US Presidential Contenders Trade Charges in TV Ads  Video clip available