Text Only
Search

 
Research Shows Small Nuclear War Could Wreak Havoc


11 December 2006

New studies suggest that a small, regional nuclear conflict involving only a few weapons could have staggering global climate consequences, bringing about a 10-year-long cooling devastating to agriculture and society at large. Researchers have reported at a San Francisco scientific meeting that small warheads can pack a huge environmental punch if aimed at large population centers. VOA's David McAlary has details.

US nuclear test in Nevada
US nuclear test in Nevada
U.S. and Russian arms accords have led to a three-fold drop in the number of nuclear weapons since 1986. But the scientists who devised the concept of nuclear winter say the potential exists for numerous regional arms races. Eight nations are known to have nuclear weapons, two are building them, and 32 more have the plutonium or uranium needed for construction.

What if two of these countries attacked each other with nuclear arms? The scientists conducted computer simulations to find out and produced what they say is the first comprehensive look at the consequences of a conflict between small nuclear states.

"The results of these studies are quite surprising," said Owen Toon.

University of Colorado atmospheric scientist Owen Toon spoke at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

"Regional-scale nuclear conflicts can inflict casualties comparable to those once predicted for a strategic attack on the United States by the USSR, and that the smoke produced can endanger the entire population of Earth to climate changes and ozone loss," he said.

Toon and his colleagues say if low-yield nuclear weapons are aimed at the centers of major cities, they can produce 100 times more deaths and 100 times more smoke from firestorms per kiloton than big weapons. One outcome would be virtually a global ozone hole, the near total loss of the barrier that filters the sun's biologically harmful ultraviolet rays. The huge smoke cloud would occur because cities have far bigger supplies of fuel, plastics and other combustible materials, according to atmospheric scientist Richard Turco of the University of California at Los Angeles.

"It's remarkable that, owing to the confluence today of nuclear proliferation, migration into megacities, and centralization of economies within these cities, human society is extremely vulnerable at this point in time," said Richard Turco.

The researchers say a small nuclear war would probably occur in the tropics, not the higher latitudes as was once feared between Washington and Moscow. The studies show that tropical detonations would have harsher climate effects because the sun's heat could raise smoke from a firestorm higher into the atmosphere, where it would have a longer cooling effect on Earth.

Rutgers University environmental scientist Alan Robock says the potential impact could be long term and colder than the so-called Little Ice Age of the late middle ages when glaciers expanded and European rivers and canals froze during bitter winters.

"If this took place in 2006, you would have immediate large cooling and this would be a global climate change unprecedented in recorded history," noted Alan Robock.

Robock says the smoke emissions would block sunlight and lower temperatures by an average of more than one degree Celsius over large areas of North America and Eurasia, far beyond the nuclear explosions themselves.

"In areas far removed from where the smoke was put in, you would have reduction in the growing season by 10 to 30 days," he said. "There would also be effects on the reduction of precipitation and reductions of sunlight and disruption of society. The tropics would also have a huge reduction of temperature and it would be very difficult for agriculture."

The scientists say a small nuclear war would not lead to a nuclear winter of the kind that a superpower conflict could have produced, but it would be a substantial global disruption.

Again, Owen Toon of the University of Colorado.

"The current combination of nuclear proliferation, political instability, and urban demographics forms perhaps the greatest danger to the stability of society since the dawn of humanity," he said.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Related Stories
US Seeks Concrete Progress in Korea Nuclear Talks
Gulf Arab States Commission Study for Shared Nuclear Program
US Congress Approves Bill to Implement US-India Nuclear Deal
 
  Top Story
UN Security Council Adopts Gaza Cease-fire Resolution

  More Stories
US Studies Withdrawing More Troops from Iraq  Audio Clip Available
UN Agency Suspends Aid Deliveries in Gaza Because of Violence  Audio Clip Available
Obama Warns of Severe Consequences Without Stimulus Package  Audio Clip Available
Russia Agrees to Gas Pipeline Monitors
Suicide Bomber Attacks Foreign Troops, Kills Civilians in Afghanistan
Recession Woes Again Batter World Markets  Audio Clip Available
Sri Lankan Military Presses Ahead with Offensive  Audio Clip Available
Diplomatic Activity Builds to Halt Eastern Congo Clashes  Audio Clip Available
Lawyers Want Charges Dropped Against Zimbabwe Activists  Audio Clip Available
Obama's Choice to Head US Health Agency Vows Reform  Audio Clip Available
Diplomat Cites Bush Efforts to Strengthen Sino-American Ties  Audio Clip Available
Africans Await Obama Inauguration with Mixed Expectations  Audio Clip Available
Two Chinese Cities Offer Incentives to Attract Overseas Professionals  Audio Clip Available
Immigrant Filmmaker Travels Rocky Road in Hollywood  Audio Clip Available