Text Only
Search

 
UN Urges End to Australia's Controversial Refugee Detention Policy


21 April 2005
Mercer report - Download 335k - Download (Real) audio clip
Mercer report - Download 335k - Listen (Real) audio clip

Australia is under pressure from the United Nations to end its controversial policy of detaining asylum seekers on the remote Pacific island of Nauru. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has called on the government in Canberra to find a humanitarian solution for asylum seekers who have been held on Nauru for more than three years under Australia's so-called 'Pacific Solution.'

Men shave, brush their teeth and prepapre for the day at a refugee camp on the Island of Nauru (File 2001)
There are 54 asylum seekers in the Australian-sponsored detention center on Nauru. Most are from Iraq and Afghanistan, and most have had their asylum applications in Australia rejected.

They refuse to return to their homelands, insisting it is still too dangerous for them to do so. But they have also exhausted all legal avenues challenging Australia's refusal to grant them refugee status. They can't go forward, and they won't go back.

This week the Australian office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees voiced its concern for the detainees' mental well-being, especially the women and children.

The UNHCR called on the government in Canberra to find a compassionate solution to the problem. The organization has suggested that other countries be encouraged to accept the asylum seekers, who have now been on the tiny Pacific island, halfway between Australia and Hawaii, for three years.

The main opposition Labor Party backs the idea. Labor's immigration spokesman, Lawrie Ferguson, says the UNHCR is on the right track. "We could have a pattern similar to the comprehensive plan in the Philippines for those Vietnamese people still in detention there, where countries around the world offer to take some of the people," he said. "So even the UNHCR says one of the options might be for other countries to accept these people."

Under new border control measures introduced by Australia in 2001, known as the "Pacific solution," would-be migrants arriving by sea from Indonesia without prior permission were transported to camps in Papua New Guinea and Nauru while their asylum applications were considered.

The two states were paid an unspecified fee - the figure for Nauru is believed to be many millions of dollars - to house the refugees. While no time limit for detention was set, Canberra pledged to process the applications "swiftly and fairly."

Canberra insists the policy has been a success, and the number of illegal arrivals has fallen sharply since 2001. The facility in Papua New Guinea has now been closed.

Canberra says more than 700 refugees who spent time on Nauru have been resettled in Australia and elsewhere. Another 500 have returned home voluntarily.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Top Story
Obama: Iraq Election Law an "Important Milestone"  Audio Clip Available

  More Stories
Iraqi Parliament Approves New Electoral Law After Raucous Debate  Audio Clip Available
US Army Chief of Staff: More Troops Needed in Afghanistan
Market Bomber Kills 13 in Northwest Pakistan
Clinton Urges Europeans to Bring Down "Walls" of Terrorism, Oppression  Audio Clip Available
Berlin to Mark the 20th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall  Audio Clip Available  Video clip available
Hurricane Ida Heads Toward Gulf of Mexico, Floods Kill 91 in El Salvador
Russia-Iran Relations Balancing on Nuclear Issue
Motive Sought for Texas Mass Shooting
Dalai Lama Rejects Chinese Criticism of Monastery Visit  Audio Clip Available
China's Premier Pledges $10 billion in Loans to Africa  Audio Clip Available
Netanyahu Heads to US Amid Crisis in Peace Process  Audio Clip Available
Japan Pledges More Aid to Burma if Political Prisoners are Released
WFP Making Inroads on Alleviating Hunger  Audio Clip Available
Deposed Madagascar President says He Will Work With Rival Who Ousted Him  Audio Clip Available
US Health Care Debate Continues on Partisan Lines