Text Only
Search

Israelis Reflect on Turbulent Year After Sharon's Stroke


06 January 2007
Berger report - Download 318k - Download (Real) audio clip
Berger report - Download 318k - Listen (Real) audio clip

It has been a year since former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon suffered a massive stroke, leaving him in a coma that ended his political career.  Israelis are still lamenting his loss and reflecting on how things might have been had he remained at the helm.  Robert Berger reports from VOA'S Jerusalem bureau.

Ariel Sharon
Ariel Sharon
The question many Israelis are asking a year after Ariel Sharon's stroke is whether things would have been better if he were still in office. It has been a turbulent year, shaped in large part by Israel's inconclusive war with Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon. Hezbollah was outnumbered and outgunned, yet it fired 4,000 rockets at Israel and survived the 34-day conflict intact.

Mr. Sharon's successor, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, has been harshly criticized for his handling of the war, and his popularity has plunged. A recent poll showed that 77 percent of Israelis disapprove of his performance.

That has raised questions about whether the popular Mr. Sharon, a former general and war hero, would have done things differently. 

"In essence, what you had after he was incapacitated was like Murphy's Law: If anything can go wrong it will go wrong," said Ra'anan Gissin, who was Mr. Sharon's adviser for 10 years. "And the war went wrong, or at least not as we expected.  If Sharon was there today, at least there would have been a sense of direction."

But Mr. Sharon also has his critics. Many Israelis say his term went downhill after he pulled Israel out of the Gaza Strip in 2005. Yaffa Reuveni, a teacher in Jerusalem, told VOA that Sharon's expulsion of 8,000 Gaza settlers was inexcusable.

"He was very cynical. He make [made it] very bad for [a] lot of people. [A] lot of people are without money, without home, without work and I don't agree with this," said Reuveni.

While Israelis debate Ariel Sharon's legacy, there is little disagreement that he would have handled the war in Lebanon more prudently than Mr. Olmert, who has little military experience. Gissin says Mr. Sharon would not have gone to a war he could not win.

"If he was awake today and in his full capacity, I doubt very much that the developments that took place would have taken place," he added.  "In other words, the fact that the war in Lebanon went as it was. Maybe there wouldn't have been a war in Lebanon."

A popular joke making the rounds has Mr. Sharon waking up from his coma. When he finds out that people with no security experience are now prime minister and defense minister, he is utterly dismayed and decides to go back to sleep.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Related Stories
Leaders of Warring Palestinian Factions Agree to Truce
Palestinian PM, President Agree to Defuse Factional Violence
Israeli Raid Casts Shadow Over Israeli-Egyptian Summit
Israel Buries Legendary Former Mayor of Jerusalem
 
  Top Story
Reports: US Ambassador to Kabul Expresses Caution About More Troops  Audio Clip Available

  More Stories
US Leaders May Interact With Burmese at Singapore Summit  Audio Clip Available
German Defense Minister in Kabul to Meet Afghan, NATO Leaders
Obama Readies for First Asia Tour
N. Korea Says South Will Pay 'Expensive Price' for Naval Clash
Clinton Vows Support for Philippine Typhoon  Recovery, Anti-Terrorism Fight  Audio Clip Available
China Rejects Human Rights Watch Report on Black Jails
Thasksin Delivers Speech in Phnom Penh
Sri Lanka Military Chief Resigns  Audio Clip Available
First Recorded Dengue Fever Epidemic Hits Cape Verde  Audio Clip Available
Pakistan Seeks Role in US-Afghan Policy
Obama's Middle East Strategy Stalls
Zimbabwe Land Seizures Reportedly Intensify  Audio Clip Available