Text Only
Search

 
British Court Stops Deportation of Darfuri Asylum Seekers


05 April 2007
Maphosa report - Download 245K audio clip
Listen to Maphosa report audio clip

Court of Appeal judges in London have ruled in favor of three Darfuri asylum seekers the British government wanted to send back to Sudan.  But as Tendai Maphosa reports from London for VOA, the judgment may be a temporary reprieve for the asylum seekers, as the government intends to petition the House of Lords for permission to appeal the court's decision.

The judges ruled that the three should not be sent back to camps in Khartoum as conditions there were "unduly harsh."  The three had appealed a ruling by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal that would have sent them back to the Sudanese capital.

The court ruling means that hundreds of Sudanese who fled violence in Darfur can now remain in Britain, at least until the government's petition is heard by the House of Lords.

A statement by the Home Office Border and Immigration Agency expressed disappointment at the decision, saying the court had not found that the non-Arab Darfuris would face mistreatment in Khartoum.

One of the three appellants, Naroudin Mohamed, who says he escaped from Darfur after being tortured, told VOA he has no doubt what would happen to him if he is sent back to Sudan.

"Definitely, if they send you back it means the end of your life - maybe they will kill you.  Thank God they did not send us back," Mohamed said.
 
James Smith, who is with a group called Aegis Trust, a non-governmental organization that has been acting on behalf of the Darfuris, said the battle for the them to remain in Britain is far from over.  He said if the government wins its appeal, his organization would present new evidence that proves that Darfuris would be victimized should they be sent back.

"This [is] important, first of all to protect the few hundred that have escaped the atrocities, and they are just a drop in the ocean, compared to the millions who are at risk out there.  Now that they are on the shores of Britain we believe that we have an obligation to protect them," Smith said.
 
Smith added that the actions of the British government are undermining all the tough talk by Prime Minister Tony Blair and other western leaders against the humanitarian crisis in Darfur.  

 

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Related Stories
UN: Janjaweed Attacks in Eastern Chad Kill 65, Thousands Flee to Refugee Camp
Janjaweed Attacks Displace Thousands in Eastern Chad
Tribal Clashes Kill 40 in Sudan's Darfur Region
 
  Top Story
US Army Charges Alleged Fort Hood Shooter with Premeditated Murder

  More Stories
Kremlin Calls for Sweeping Modernization of Russia  Audio Clip Available
Union Says Zimbabwe Farm Workers Worst Abused Sector in Past 10 Years  Video clip available
Obama Orders Revisions to Afghan Options
Obama Begins First Presidential Trip to Asia  Audio Clip Available
Obama to Hold Jobs Summit in December   Audio Clip Available  Video clip available
Reports: US Ambassador to Kabul Expresses Caution About More Troops  Audio Clip Available
APEC Ministers say Economic Recovery Fragile  Audio Clip Available
Clinton Vows Support for Philippine Typhoon  Recovery, Anti-Terrorism Fight  Audio Clip Available
US Leaders May Interact With Burmese at Singapore Summit  Audio Clip Available
N. Korea Says South Will Pay 'Expensive Price' for Naval Clash
China Rejects Human Rights Watch Report on Black Jails
Thasksin Delivers Speech in Phnom Penh
Sri Lanka Military Chief Resigns  Audio Clip Available
As Alleged Fort Hood Shooter Recovers, New Questions Arise  Video clip available
Pakistan Seeks Role in US-Afghan Policy
Obama's Middle East Strategy Stalls
Zimbabwe Land Seizures Reportedly Intensify  Audio Clip Available
First Recorded Dengue Fever Epidemic Hits Cape Verde  Audio Clip Available
Paisley, Swift Winners at CMA Awards  Audio Clip Available