Text Only
Search

 
White House, Congress Negotiate New War Funds


05 May 2007
Stearns report - Download 278k audio clip
Listen to Stearns report audio clip

President Bush and congressional Democrats are negotiating new funding for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq after the president vetoed a measure earlier this week because it included a timetable for a troop withdrawal from Iraq. VOA White House Correspondent Scott Stearns has the story.

President Bush speaking at the White House, 1 May 2007
President Bush speaking at the White House, 01 May 2007

President Bush says he is confident political leaders can agree on a war spending bill as he says Democrats have assured him they are committed to funding the troops.

Mr. Bush vetoed $124 billion worth of spending this past Tuesday because it would have forced him to start withdrawing troops from Iraq by October. In his weekly radio address, he said the time for politics is over.

"I recognize that many Democratic leaders saw this bill as an opportunity to make a statement about their opposition to the war. In a democracy, we should debate our differences openly and honestly. But now it is time to give our troops the resources they are waiting for," he said.

Without the two-thirds majority needed to over-ride the president's veto, Democrats began negotiating a new spending bill with White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten.

Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Charles Schumer (file photo)
In the Democratic radio address, New York Senator Charles Schumer said the president's veto will not deter opposition legislators from supporting the troops while pushing to change the mission in Iraq.

"We know how strongly the president feels that he is right. But if he looked at the facts on the ground, he would have to come to the conclusion that most Americans have: We need a change in direction," he said.

President Bush says he has changed direction in Iraq by sending more troops to better secure Baghdad. As that new strategy is still in its early stages, Mr. Bush says Congress needs to give it a chance to work.

He rejects a timetable for a troop withdrawal because he says that would embolden the enemy and make America appear weak.

"I know that Republicans and Democrats will not agree on every issue in this war," he said. "But the consequences of failure in Iraq are clear. If we were to leave Iraq before the government can defend itself, there would be a security vacuum in the country. Extremists from all factions could compete to fill that vacuum, causing sectarian killing to multiply on a horrific scale."

Senator Schumer says it is not the job of U.S. troops to police a civil war between Sunni and Shi'ite. He says Democrats want to focus more on training Iraqi forces and conducting counter-terrorism operations against al-Qaida camps that might pose a threat to America.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Related Stories
Suicide Bomber Kills at Least 10 Police Recruits West of Baghdad
Iraq Conference Ends Without High-Level Meeting Between US and Iran
Iraq, Afghan Wars Cause Concern in US Military About Readiness
 
  Top Story
Obama Honors US Military Veterans  Video clip available

  More Stories
Obama's Middle East Strategy Stalls
French, German Leaders Commemorate Armistice Day  Audio Clip Available
At Least 10 Soldiers Killed in Pakistan Clashes
Body of Missing US Soldier Found in Afghanistan
Yemen, US Sign Military Cooperation Deal
Pirates Seize Cargo Ship in Indian Ocean
Clinton: Naval Clash Won't Stop Outreach to North Korea  Audio Clip Available
APEC Foreign Ministers Discourage Protectionism  Audio Clip Available
German Courtroom Killer Gets Life Sentence
Zimbabwe Land Seizures Reportedly Intensify  Audio Clip Available
Japan to Tell Obama It Wants Okinawa Marine Base Closed  Audio Clip Available
Britain's Latest War Dead Come Home to Rest  Video clip available
Cambodia Rejects Thai Request to Extradite Former Leader  Audio Clip Available