Text Only
Search

 
War on Terror: Policy Experts See A World Growing More Dangerous


31 August 2007

War On Terror
According to a recent survey conducted by Foreign Policy magazine and the liberal policy group, Center for American Progress, 100 of America’s most respected foreign policy experts see a world that is growing more dangerous, a national security strategy in disarray, and a war in Iraq that is alarmingly off-track.  And that’s six years after the September 11th terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, which prompted the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and the larger war against terrorism.

Caroline Wadhams, a senior policy analyst for national security at the Center for American Progress, is one of the co-sponsors of the survey.  Speaking with host Carol Castiel of VOA News Now’s Encounter program, Ms. Wadhams says 91 percent of the experts believe the world is getting less safe for the American people and 85 percent believe the United States is not winning the war on terrorism.  She said the major factor driving that pessimism is the war in Iraq.  Although the Bush administration did well in some areas, such as controlling terrorist financing, Ms. Wadhams says, it received “low grades” in areas such as public diplomacy and democracy promotion.

Dana Dillon, the author of China Challenge, is a retired major in the U.S. Army and a former senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative policy group based in Washington.  He says that, although the United States is not winning the war terrorism, neither is it losing that war.   For example, terrorism has been reduced in Indonesia, but not in Iraq and Afghanistan, even though the “surge” in Iraq has temporarily reduced the amount of violence there.  Caroline Wadhams counters that the purpose of the surge was to “create space for political reconciliation,” but Iraq’s leaders have not gotten any closer to meeting political goals such as sharing oil revenues and including more Sunnis in the government. Even though the military aspect of the surge is going well, according to Mr. Dillon, he agrees with General David Petraeus, the top U.S. Commander in Iraq, that military success represents “only a small fraction of what you can do in a counter-insurgency.” 

Some critics of the war argue that the U.S. military presence in Iraq exacerbates violence. But Dana Dillon says the critical question to ask is:  “We’re there now, so what do we do?”  He notes that time is on the side of the insurgents and all they have to do is “not lose.”  Regarding comparisons with the war in Vietnam, Mr. Dillon says a lot of “terrible things will also happen in Iraq” if the U.S. military pulls out, although he thinks it may be possible to “develop a better relationship with Iraq in the future.”

Demonstrators in paskitan
Most of the experts surveyed think the “next al-Qaida stronghold will be in Pakistan." They also chose Pakistan as the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists
Caroline Wadhams says the Terrorism Index highlights Pakistan as a major problem. About half the experts surveyed believe U.S. policy toward Pakistan is having a “negative impact on U.S. national security,” and most of them think the “next al-Qaida stronghold will be in Pakistan.”  They also chose Pakistan as the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists.  She describes the war in Iraq as a “distraction” that has strained the military to an extent that the United States is unable to meet other threats and it has diverted attention from the Pakistan-Afghanistan border where the Taleban and al-Qaida have found safe haven.  But Ms. Wadhams says the experts were “all over the map” on what to do about Pakistan. 

Regarding Saudi Arabia, Dana Dillon says it is a “tainted friend.”  He says one of the reasons Saudi Arabia funds madrassas, or Islamic schools, in other Muslim countries is to “displace the terrorists from attacking the Saudi government.”   He says fighting terrorism will require a combination of economic development, diplomacy, and what he calls the “linkage of all agencies of government.”  To combat global terrorism, Caroline Wadhams says, the “first step” is to get out of Iraq because the war has become the “perfect recruiting tool for al-Qaida and its affiliates.”

For full audio of the program Encounter click here.

 

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version

  Related Stories
Sydney Deploys Fortress-Like Security for APEC Summit
Shi'ite Militiamen Stay Off Baghdad Streets, Obeying Cleric's Order
Iraq's FM: 'Great Deal' of Progress Achieved in Improving Security
Radical Iraqi Shi'ite Cleric Orders Militia to Halt Activities
More Kidnappings in Violent Pakistan-Afghan Border Region
 
  Top Story
US Army Charges Alleged Fort Hood Shooter with Premeditated Murder

  More Stories
Obama Orders Revisions to Afghan Options
Reports: US Ambassador to Kabul Expresses Caution About More Troops  Audio Clip Available
Obama Readies for First Asia Tour
APEC Ministers say  Economic Recovery is Fragile  Audio Clip Available
Clinton Vows Support for Philippine Typhoon  Recovery, Anti-Terrorism Fight  Audio Clip Available
US Leaders May Interact With Burmese at Singapore Summit  Audio Clip Available
N. Korea Says South Will Pay 'Expensive Price' for Naval Clash
China Rejects Human Rights Watch Report on Black Jails
Thasksin Delivers Speech in Phnom Penh
Sri Lanka Military Chief Resigns  Audio Clip Available
As Alleged Fort Hood Shooter Recovers, New Questions Arise  Video clip available
Pakistan Seeks Role in US-Afghan Policy
Obama's Middle East Strategy Stalls
Zimbabwe Land Seizures Reportedly Intensify  Audio Clip Available
First Recorded Dengue Fever Epidemic Hits Cape Verde  Audio Clip Available
Paisley, Swift Winners at CMA Awards  Audio Clip Available