VOANews.com

 
Live Streams:  Latest Newscast |  Africa Live |  Global Live
News in 45 Languages
US Livestock ID Plan Stirs Debate


10 July 2009

When the first case of mad cow disease was discovered in a U.S. cattle herd almost six ago, it prompted calls for a national system that could prevent the spread of the incurable, brain-wasting illness and other diseases by tracking livestock from birth to slaughter. 

A voluntary effort to track livestock

An ear tag usually carries an individual identification number or code for the animal, or for its herd or flock
An ear tag usually carries an individual identification number or code for the animal, or for its herd or flock
The U.S. Department of Agriculture soon rolled out a voluntary program designed to identify cattle, pigs and other livestock and the farms they come from. Since then, two more cases of mad cow disease have been reported in the United States. And today, with only about one in four cattle bearing an official ID tag, the USDA says it needs more participation to make the program work.

Cattlemen like Homer Buell use electronic ID tags for internal recordkeeping. The fourth-generation rancher runs Black Angus cows on his ranch in the Sandhills of north-central Nebraska.

But the U.S. Department of Agriculture wants more producers to register their livestock facilities and identify their animals with official ID tags. The agency just wrapped up a series of "listening sessions" in cities around the country. They were aimed at giving producers a chance to comment on the animal ID program and letting the USDA measure industry support for it.

Objections to what ranchers see as government intrusion

But anti-government sentiment runs deep here. And many speakers at the final session near Omaha view animal ID as government intrusion.

Black Hereford-Angus cattle graze in a pasture on Homer Buell's north-central Nebraska ranch
Black Hereford-Angus cattle graze in a pasture on Homer Buell's north-central Nebraska ranch
To applause from the crowd, livestock market manager Richard Schrunk told the officials, "No, we do not need animal ID!" He said producers already know how to keep track of their animals.  Many maintain a computer database of their electronically tagged livestock, although that data is not collected now in a national directory. 

Schrunk said that in the event of a disease outbreak, producers could share their records with animal health officials very quickly.

"We may not be able to trace them back in 24 hours, but I guarantee you, in 72 hours, we can trace those back."

Concern about rapid spread of disease

But that could be too long, say veterinarians like Ron DeHaven, who's with the American Veterinary Medical Association. Without a full tracking system in place, he worries about the risk of diseases like the highly contagious foot-and-mouth virus, which has plagued herds on several continents.

"If we were to have an introduction of that kind of disease, we could spread it into 10, 15 or 20 states within a matter of one or two days."

DeHaven argues that animal ID should be mandatory in the United States, as it is in places like Japan and the European Union.

The USDA ID system would track livestock from birth to slaughter
The USDA ID system would track livestock from birth to slaughter
Mandatory animal ID does have some support within the industry - including from groups like the National Pork Producers Council, which advocates federal funding for the program.

But many individual producers fear a mandate would harm their industry. Rancher Kris Harvey says she's afraid powerful meatpacking companies could gain access to electronic information about local ranchers' livestock herds and use that to justify paying producers less for their animals. Harvey says she and her husband hope someday to pass on their ranch near the South Dakota-Nebraska border to one of their five children, adding, "I hate to think that because of a government bureaucracy … we won't be able to offer our children that option, because it will no longer be profitable to raise cattle."

She notes, ruefully, that the cattle business is barely profitable now, and - since small producers like her family have less bargaining power - they would absorb much of the system's costs. For cattle, the USDA estimates the total cost at about $6 per animal. But the price would vary widely, depending on the number and type of animals produced.

A cure worse than the disease?

This sign marks the sandy dirt road that leads to Homer Buell's ranch in the Nebraska Sand Hills
This sign marks the sandy dirt road that leads to Homer Buell's ranch in the Nebraska Sandhills
Back on his ranch, Homer Buell says he thinks forcing all producers to participate could be impractical.

"It's not easy when you have the number of cows we have in the United States, that we have in Nebraska, to set up an ID system that would work effectively. It'd be tough," he concludes.

What would be even tougher, animal health officials say, is a disease outbreak without a full tracking system in place. But if the solution requires mandatory animal ID, some producers fear the cure more than the disease.



Comments:

1. unknow

I unknow all means
Submitted by: alchemy (china)
07-12-2009 - 14:20:02

2. for africa to develop

i came to realise that its not even the nuclear power that africa needs inorder to develop.its actually the availability of good fertilizer to enrich its soil. TAMBUA VILLAGE(tv), HAMISI(vihiga),KENYA.
Submitted by: david lulasa AKA daudee mwanzi (kenya)
07-11-2009 - 09:37:14

3. US Livestock ID Plan Stirs Debate

The drafting of NAIS goes back at least to 1984. After 9-11, NAIS was launched for the purpose of terrorism. In 2002, a Canadian BSE cow was discovered in Washington State. It is a mystery why the cow was allowed to cross the border, why the cow was not tested, why the cow's origin was not marked, why all imported cattle are not quarantined until slaughter and why USDA withheld the origin of the cow before finally reporting it. It is a greater mystery that no safeguard or action has been taken so that this does not happen again. BSE is dangerous for human consumption but it is not a transmittable or contagious disease, as your article asserts. There is no scientific proof that NAIS is more effective than our current disease program. Australia has implemented NAIT and has proven be costly and not effective. And I regret that the Cattlemen's Association has been successful at labeling anybody that opposes NAIS as anti-government. Dr. DeHaven should know that Japan's tracking s
Submitted by: MRD (U.S.)
07-11-2009 - 05:17:54

Download McCammon report
Download  (MP3)
Listen to This Report McCammon report
Listen (MP3)
E-mail This Article E-mail This Article
Print This Article Print Version
  Top Story
Berlin Wall Celebration Marked by Joy and Caution  Audio Clip Available

  More Stories
Officials Warn of Possible Collapse of Palestinian Authority
Hariri Names New Lebanese Government After Five Week Vacuum  Audio Clip Available
US Had Previously Monitored Fort Hood Shooting Suspect
NATO: 130 Militants Killed in Afghanistan
US, Germany Press Afghan President on Reform  Audio Clip Available
Clinton Urges 'Compassion' for Americans Detained in Iran  Audio Clip Available
Iran Charges 3 US Detainees with Espionage
Iraq Electoral Official Says Vote Will Happen On Time   Audio Clip Available
Afghans React To Possible US Troop Surge  Audio Clip Available
Suicide Bomber Kills 3 in Northwestern Pakistan
China Executes Nine Ethnic Uighurs in July Unrest
APEC Economies Report Improved Trade Finance, Discuss Free Trade  Audio Clip Available
Scientists Report Abnormal Sea Level Rises Off Western Australia  Audio Clip Available
Tropical Storm Ida Aims For US Gulf Coast;  State of Emergency in Effect
Obama Makes First China Tour as Economic Interdependence Grows  Video clip available
  Related Links
National Animal Identification System
USDA Animal Health