The Federal Reserve would get new powers to identify companies considered too big to fail. A proposed new agency to protect financial consumers faces industry opposition. Transcript of radio broadcast: 18 June 2009
This is
the VOA Special English Economics Report.
On
Wednesday, President Obama proposed major changes to rebuild government supervision
of the financial industry.
President Obama announces his plan at the White House
BARACK
OBAMA: "So today, my administration is proposing a sweeping overhaul of
the financial regulatory system, a transformation on a scale not seen since the
reforms that followed the Great Depression."
The current
economic downturn grew out of a culture of irresponsible lending and borrowing
and "a failure of the entire system," he said. He says a new system
is needed to meet the speed and complexity of a twenty-first century global
economy.
Treasury
Secretary Tim Geithner says the financial crisis developed in part because the
existing system let some companies "shop for the weakest regulator." He discussed
the plan before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday.
One goal
is to increase supervision of big companies whose failure could threaten the
financial system. The Federal Reserve would gain new powers. The central bank
would work with a proposed Financial Services Oversight Council to decide which
companies are too big to fail.
The idea
is to identify troubled companies early. But the Fed would now have to seek
permission from the Treasury to carry out emergency lending.
The
administration also proposes a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency. It would
be responsible for protecting people from unfair and abusive practices with borrowing
and investing.
The
administration also supports another proposal. Lenders would have to keep five
percent of the home loans they would normally group together to sell as
securities. The idea is that lenders will be more responsible in making loans
if they might not be able to pass off risky mortgages to investors.
Democratic
leaders in Congress say they hope to pass a bill for the president to sign by
the end of the year.
Some
groups were dissatisfied with the proposals. Insurance companies hoping for simplified
rules will continue to deal with different supervisors in every state. And there
is almost no effort to combine the numerous federal regulatory agencies into a
single financial regulator.
An
industry group, the Financial Services Roundtable, says it supports many of the
administration's proposals -- but not for a consumer protection agency. It
opposes separating the regulation of a company from its products, saying each
regulator will only have half the information. The industry "does not
necessarily need more regulation," it says," but rather more
effective regulation."
And
that's the VOA Special English Economics Report, written by Mario Ritter. I'm Steve Ember.
hello
I like this website because it's very benific for learning english, and because I'm algerian and we don't have a lot of schools for learn english in algeria, thank's a lot Submitted by: riad (algeria) 06-26-2009 - 20:21:10
2. My opinion
I think Obama is a great president. Submitted by: Nguyen Huong (Viet Nam) 06-26-2009 - 05:32:12
3. Where is the borderline?
It has been under the impression that in a mixed economy i.e a combination of planned econonmy and market economy like China, the government has a bigger say than the market whereas in a purely market economy like the States, the situation is the other way around. However, this has been changing since the world financial crisis. It seems that the two is moving towards each other. To take China and the States for instance. The former was once under the severe attack for her stringent business governance while the latter, was praised for its "invisible hand". But nowadays China is laying more and more emphasis on market-oriented economy whereas the States on government-intervened. Thus the question: where is the boarderline? May be there will be only one economy in the world. That is "global economy" whereby the definition of socialism and capitalism will be integrated with each other. Submitted by: TANG Qixiong (The People's Republic of China) 06-20-2009 - 00:48:42
4. reform
political system is good, enterprise system should be change. Bosses should be responsible for society, instead focus on interest. the enterprises should be run by government, in this way, hire more works, and reduce the working, pressure. work is so important for a family and children. Submitted by: James luo (Canada) 06-19-2009 - 17:49:16
5. English learning
it is very god program for english learning Submitted by: Amanullah Ashna (Afghanistan) 06-19-2009 - 14:46:26
6. I want you permit me to repost a special English
Dear sir,
I'm now, studying in English major so I want to repost a special English on my blog and keep it forever. I want you write a permitting email and send me by email address. I will repost it on my blog : www.khmerbotra.com or, www.soddhipong.com
and subdomain : http://eclub.khmerbotra.com
Best regards,
Khmerbotra Submitted by: Khmerbotra (Cambodia) 06-19-2009 - 07:05:20
7.
It has been under the impression that in a mixed economy i.e a combination of planned econonmy and market economy like China, the government has a bigger say than the market whereas in a purely market economy like the States, the situation is the other way around. However, this has been changing since the world financial crisis. It seems that the two is moving towards each other. To take China and the States for instance. The former was once under the severe attack for her stringent business governance while the latter, was praised for its "invisible hand". But nowadays China is laying more and more emphasis on market-oriented economy whereas the States on government-intervened. Thus the question: where is the boarderline? May be there will be only one economy in the world. That is "global economy" whereby the definition of socialism and capitalism will be integrated with each other. Submitted by: Where is the boarderline? (the People's Republic of China) 06-19-2009 - 06:29:06
8. the economic repair : )
Pres. Obama and his team and Timothy F. Geithner are doing a great job. Thank God they have the brilliant minds to put the mess of the past on the road to recovery and make our country they way it was ment to be. They know what their doing. Let them work. and Thank them! : D Submitted by: Dawn Nichols (U S A) 06-19-2009 - 01:42:14
9. The Federal Reserve would get new powers
Giving the Federal Reserve more power when they can't account for over 9 trillion in bale out money is absolutely absurd. They can't even handle what power they have let alone take on more responsibilities. Their credibility is totally shot. The President needs to start his reform with the immediate dismissal of Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman for gross negligence and incompetence. Submitted by: Austin Mayo (Canada) 06-19-2009 - 01:28:49
10. Giving the Fed even more power?
Doesn't this seem a little wrong since the Fed is one of the main reasons we are having so many problems with the American economy and their control of the currency?
Seems kind of funny that we want to give even more power to the Fed after all the trouble a central bank has caused for the country. Submitted by: Tom (Canada) 06-18-2009 - 23:39:52