FILE - Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y. with Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington.
FILE - Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y. with Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington.

CAPITOL HILL - U.S. President Donald Trump says he is ready to use his veto power as he acknowledged the U.S. Senate is likely to disapprove his national emergency declaration to fund wall construction along the U.S.-Mexico border.

"I don't know what the vote will be. It doesn't matter. I'll probably have to veto," Trump said during a White House meeting Thursday with Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar.

A handful of Senate Republicans have committed to joining a unified Democratic caucus in rejecting the emergency declaration, all but assuring the disapproval measure’s passage in a chamber where Republicans have a narrow 53-47 majority.

Copies of Volume 1 of U.S. President Donald Trump's budget for Fiscal Year 2020 sit atop a desk after being delivered by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to the House Budget Committee room on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 11, 2019.
Trump's 2020 Budget Includes $8.6 Billion for Border Wall
The White House on Monday unveiled a $4.7 trillion government spending plan for 2020, a request that includes President Donald Trump's call for another $8.6 billion for his signature project, construction of a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border to thwart illegal immigration.Trump's request for border wall funding presages a new fight with lawmakers over the issue in the coming months during the third year of the Trump presidency.

“Are we going to say, anytime a president can’t get his way with Congress, he can declare an emergency and Congress will meekly shrug its shoulders?” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said. “What a disgrace.”

FILE - People gather during a protest against U.S.
FILE - People gather during a protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's declaration of a national emergency to build a border wall, outside Trump International Hotel & Tower in Manhattan, New York.

Many Republicans have expressed unease over the national emergency declaration, noting the U.S. Constitution grants Congress authority over spending matters. But most are expected to vote against the disapproval measure, citing an urgent need to secure America’s southern border.

“I’m voting with you, Mr. President,” Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe tweeted. “There is no country without borders.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., speaks at an Economic Club of Washington luncheon gathering in Washington, March 8, 2019.
Senate Rejection of Trump Border Emergency No Longer Certain
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to make it harder for Republicans to avoid an embarrassing Senate rebuff of President Donald Trump’s effort to steer billions of extra federal dollars to building barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border by declaring a national emergency.As the White House and GOP senators sought a compromise on curbing a president’s power to unilaterally declare such emergencies in the future, Pelosi said Wednesday that the House would not take up that legislation if it passed the…

Veto probable

The Democratically led House of Representatives approved the measure, which is expected to trigger the first veto of Trump’s presidency should it reach his desk.

"A big National Emergency vote today by The United States Senate on Border Security &  the Wall (which is already under major construction)," he tweeted Thursday.  "I am prepared to veto, if necessary. The Southern Border is a National Security and Humanitarian Nightmare, but it can be easily fixed!"


Congress has not funded Trump’s border wall requests, including during the first two years of the president’s term in office when the Republican Party controlled the legislature. Earlier this year, a politically divided Congress provided limited funds to erect new fencing along small sections of the U.S.-Mexico border, an outlay Trump deemed inadequate.


A national emergency declaration empowers a president to redirect federal funds in response to a sudden and grave crisis. Democrats noted that America’s border deficiencies have been debated for decades, and in making the declaration, Trump himself said he “didn’t have to do it.”

President Donald Trump speaks during an event in t
President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House to declare a national emergency in order to build a wall along the southern border, Feb. 15, 2019, in Washington.

Major stumbling block

For some Republicans, a major stumbling block is setting a precedent that could be used by a future Democratic president to evade the will of Congress.

“Imagine in the future a socialist-inclined president who wants to fund the Green New Deal [Global Warming resolution] or declare an emergency against the Second Amendment [constitutional right to bear arms],” Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said. “Congress needs to fund border security—no question. But no president should go around Congress.”

As the Senate prepared to vote, some Republicans put forth legislation to limit the National Emergencies Act, which became law in 1976 and has been used by all presidents since to trigger swift federal action. Democrats noted the Republican proposal would do nothing to rein in Trump’s current emergency declaration.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, declared the bill will not pass Congress.

“The House will not take up this legislation to give President Trump a pass [on the emergency declaration],” Pelosi said in a statement.

Campaign promise

Building a border wall was one of Trump’s primary promises to voters in his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump repeatedly stated that Mexico, not the United States, would pay for it.

The White House argued Mexico is paying for the wall indirectly as a result of the expected economic benefits from a new free trade agreement negotiated between the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Aside from congressional action, the national emergency declaration is being challenged in the federal court system, which may have the final word in whether it survives.