Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) watches as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers his second State of the Union address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Capitol Hill in Washington Feb. 5, 2019
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) watches as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers his second State of the Union address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Capitol Hill in Washington Feb. 5, 2019

U.S. allies have given a cautious welcome to the announcement of a second summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, to be held later this month in the Vietnamese city of Da Nang.

The planned meeting was the major foreign policy announcement Tuesday in President Trump’s State of the Union address.  He said the rapprochement with Pyongyang, which began with a summit in Singapore last June, was a major success of his presidency.

“Nuclear testing has stopped, and there has not been a missile launch in more than 15 months,” Trump told lawmakers and guests gathered on Capitol Hill.

President Donald Trump delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 5, 2019.
Conflict, Trade Feature in Trump's State of the Union Foreign Policy
In the foreign policy section of his State of the Union Address, U.S. President Donald Trump spoke of ending conflicts where American troops have fought for years, and preventing what he sees as inevitable future conflicts if not for the policies enacted by his administration.Afghanistan, Iraq warsTrump noted the vast costs of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of nearly 7,000 U.S.

To audible gasps from some in the audience, Donald Trump said America would likely be at war with North Korea if his Democrat rival Hillary Clinton had won the presidency in 2016.  His claims of success in negotiations with Pyongyang are disputed, says Leslie Vinjamuri, head of the US program at policy group Chatham House.

“There hasn’t been the kind of progress with North Korea that the president’s claiming.  There’s still evidence that they are committed to their nuclear program.”

A spokesperson for the South Korean president said, “We hope that the two leaders take more specific and practical actions in Vietnam.”

Seoul is taking a cautious approach, says U.S. Policy Analyst and author James D. Boys.

“I would imagine that there are many people in South Korea who are concerned at this point that perhaps Donald Trump might continue that withdrawal process, and talk about bringing American troops home from the Korean peninsula, in exchange for any nuclear agreement.”

Troop withdrawals

The U.S. president pledged to bring more American troops home from conflicts overseas.

“We have spent more than $7 trillion in the Middle East.  As a candidate for president, I pledged a new approach.  Great nations do not fight endless wars,” he told lawmakers.

The U.S. Capitol building is seen before U.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address in front of the U.S. Congress, on Capitol Hill in Washington January 28, 2014.  REUTERS/Jim Bourg (UNITED STATES  - Tags: POLITICS)   - RTX17
US Senate Criticizes Trump's Plan to Withdraw Troops from Syria, Afghanistan
The U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to caution President Donald Trump against swift U.S. troop withdrawals from Syria and Afghanistan.Trump revealed his decision to withdraw all U.S. forces from Syria in December, declaring that the U.S.

He added that peace talks with the Taliban in Afghanistan must be given a chance, and the Islamic State terror group had been largely defeated in Syria.

But there are growing concerns among allies over an American withdrawal from the region, says Leslie Vinjamuri.

“As to whether you can really rely on the Taliban to deliver on any peace settlement that might be agreed, certainly a lot of concern by women in Afghanistan and what that would mean.  And again the same line that he’s going to pull America’s troops out of Syria and there’s very grave concern there about what the implications for stability in Syria, for ISIS, whether that threat will grow.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin, center, attends a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, left, and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu in the Kremlin in Moscow, Feb. 2, 2019. Putin said Russia would abandon the 1987 Intermediate-range Nucl
Analysts Call Scrapping INF 'Strategic Catastrophe' for Kremlin
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday suspended the Cold War-era Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in response to a similar move by the United States on Friday."The American partners have declared that they suspend their participation in the deal. We suspend it as well," Putin announced during a televised meeting with foreign ministers and military brass.The U.S. on Friday vowed to withdraw from the INF Treaty in six months unless Moscow ended what it called violations of the…


Trump criticized Moscow’s purported violation of the Cold War-era Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, from which the United States and Russia have pulled out recently, and warned if there is no new agreement "the U.S. would outspend and out-innovate all others."

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at the Kremlin in Moscow, Feb. 2, 2019.
Russia Joins US, Will Suspend INF Nuclear Treaty
The United States and Russia are making tit-for-tat moves with their participation in a nuclear treaty, something politicians and analysts see as a burgeoning arms race.Russian President Vladimir Putin announced Saturday that Russia is suspending its participation in the Cold War-era Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

NATO allies are fearful of an arms race with Russia and an unpredictable U.S. president, says analyst James D. Boys.

“It’s notable that he was very critical of European leaders, NATO allies, claiming that they had to be dragged kicking and screaming to their share of defense expenditure for example, and yet spoke quite warmly of people like President Xi from China.”

While the speech appears to have done little to answer questions about foreign policy among European allies, the impression from afar is the State of the Union address was largely aimed at addressing the president’s challenges at home.