News / Asia

Indicted Chinese Co-Defendants Face Tightly Controlled Legal System

A combination photograph shows British businessman Neil Heywood (L) at an Aston Martin dealership in Beijing, May 26, 2010, and Gu Kailai, wife of fallen Chinese politician Bo Xilai, at a mourning service held for her father-in-law in Beijing, China, Janu
A combination photograph shows British businessman Neil Heywood (L) at an Aston Martin dealership in Beijing, May 26, 2010, and Gu Kailai, wife of fallen Chinese politician Bo Xilai, at a mourning service held for her father-in-law in Beijing, China, Janu
TEXT SIZE - +
The indictment on murder charges of Gu Kailai, wife of Bo Xilai, and Zhang Xiaojun, a family employee, has set China's unique legal system in motion.

Chinese prosecutors have accused Gu and Zhang Thursday of poisoning British businessman Neil Heywood, once a close associate of Bo Xilai's family, who was found dead in a Chinese hotel last November. 

The indictment specifically charges the co-defendants with "intentional homicide." 

What comes next in the case is pretty easy to predict, according to Chinese attorney Jim Li, who studied law at Beijing University and in the United States. We contacted him at his firm in New York, Jim Li & Associates.

Jim Li: "Gu and [her] associate will face the death penalty, according to the Chinese penalty law. In China, acts...might be divided into two [categories]: one is intentionally, one is not - unintentionally.  Intentional murderer will face the death penalty."

VOA: What happens now? She is in police custody, and we can assume her co-defendant is as well. Where does the legal system go?

Jim Li: "The next step, they are going to appear before a judge.  They’re going to have an attorney, a lawyer to defend them. That should be done within a month."

VOA: Will they face a court with a jury of their peers?

Jim Lee: "In Chinese system, there [is a] forum with normally three judges.  So there’s no such jury like in the [United] States. And, also, there’s no arraignment hearing. No such hearing in China.  [She] was indicted, the next hearing will normally be individual merits hearing."

VOA:  Is it your experience that the lawyers who represent the defendants have a fair opportunity to defend their clients?  

Jim Li: "No. They have no fair opportunity to have their own lawyer to defend them freely.  [The] lawyers under the Chinese system, particularly related to political issues, will be controlled by the authorities. The lawyers cannot freely defend them."

VOA:  So by definition the lawyers who are assigned to the two co-defendants are biased? They’re chosen by the government?

Jim Li: "No. They have the freedom to choose their own lawyers. The family...could find a lawyer for their relatives freely. But the lawyers are not free. The lawyer who would be hired will be controlled by the Chinese authorities. For example, they could not defend 'not guilty.' "

VOA:  But can the co-defendants plead not guilty?

Jim Li: "The lawyer cannot say 'not guilty' before the judge for some important cases, not every case, not by law. Under the Chinese political and legal situations,  lawyers are controlled by the authorities. They are not free to defend a 'not guilty' plea."

VOA:  In what way are they controlled?

Jim Lee:  "They are threatened. Some lawyers are chased out of the court."

VOA: This proceeding that is going to take place, is it something that is going to be televised for the Chinese public?

Jim Li: "No. Definitely not.  It is impossible. The media in China also are now afraid to report this case.  All the news released about this case will be…issued by Xinhua agency. No other media could freely report this case."

VOA: You’re painting a picture where there’s really not much maneuvering room for the defendants.

Jim Li: "There is only one thing [where] there is room for the defendants: whether or not they are going to face the death penalty, because I read the indictment charges and they [contend the defendants] murdered Mr. Heywood because Gu felt that...her son was facing some danger [from] Mr. Heywood. This is an indication that Gu has one reason for not [facing] death penalty."

VOA: Does her motivation itself give Gu the opportunity to avoid the death penalty?

Jim Li:  "That’s right. Because the indictment provided a motivation. That’s very odd to me.  It’s not so usual for the motivation for such important a case. Most likely, they are going to give a leeway to Gu for no death penalty.  There’s another penalty of punishment for the death penalty, it says probation of the death penalty for two years... Before the [end of] probation the court will change the sentence to a life sentence."

VOA: Is there any process in the Chinese legal system that allows them to appeal?

Jim Li: "Yes, definitely. Under the procedure criminal procedure law, they have the right to appeal,  but you know that most important cases all procedures are controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.  So the appeal will fail."

VOA's Catherine Maddux contributed to this story from Washington.

You May Like

Experts Weigh In on Challenges of Closing Guantanamo Prison

Former chief military prosecutor at Guantanamo delivers petition to White House with more than 370,000 signatures, demanding facility be closed down immediately More

Karzai to Discuss Enhancing Defense Ties with India

Afghanistan looking for more military aid as it prepares for withdrawal of NATO forces by next year More

India, China Pledge to Overcome Border Tensions

Indian prime minister and Chinese premier attempt to move past tense standoff in the Himalayas during Delhi talks More

Burmese President Opens US Visit with VOA Town Hall Meeting

Ahead of his meeting with President Obama Monday, Thein Sein answered questions on human rights and economic development in his country More

This forum has been closed.
Comments
     
There are no comments in this forum. Be first and add one

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video US Oil Surge Could Impact Mideast Geopolitics

The United States will account for a third of new oil supplies over the next five years, and will become energy self-sufficient in 20 years, according to a new report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA). Although U.S. oil imports from Arab Gulf countries increased last year, analysts predict the U.S. will lose its dependence on Middle East imports, which is expected to have a huge impact on international relations and the balance of power. VOA's Henry Ridgewell reports.