News / Middle East

Is Israel’s ‘Iron Dome’ All It’s Cracked Up to Be?

A missile is launched by an "Iron Dome" battery, a short-range missile defense system on July 11, 2014 in the southern Israeli city of Ashdod.
A missile is launched by an "Iron Dome" battery, a short-range missile defense system on July 11, 2014 in the southern Israeli city of Ashdod.
Cecily Hilleary

A U.S. Senate defense subcommittee has voted to double funding for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system.  The Pentagon originally requested $175 million for Iron Dome, but if the new bill passes, Israel would receive more than $350 million.

That’s good news for Israel—and for American defense contractors slated to receive more than half those funds to co-produce more Iron Dome units.   But critics question such big spending on a system they say doesn’t live up to its glowing reputation.

A clever system

Iron Dome was developed after Israel’s second war with Lebanon in 2006, when about 4,000 rockets were fired from southern Lebanon. 

Jeremy BinnieJeremy Binnie
x
Jeremy Binnie
Jeremy Binnie

“What is special about Iron Dome is that it’s the only one of its kind,” said Jeremy Binnie, Middle East/Africa editor for IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly.  

“It’s the only missile interception system which is designed to intercept short-range rockets.  And that is largely because of the relatively unique situation that Israel has found itself in, where it has had this particular threat both coming from Gaza and from Hezbollah in southern Lebanon,” he said. 

Iron Dome consists of several units, or batteries.  It is not clear how many batteries are currently deployed.

“Because of operational considerations, we unfortunately can't elaborate about the number,” Israeli Defense Force spokeswoman Libby Weiss told VOA in an email.

Israel said it would need as many as 15 batteries to fully protect its citizens from attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah in Lebanon. 

Each battery is a cluster of three transportable components: a computerized radar detection and tracking unit; a management and control unit; and a box launcher, outfitted with about 60 missiles called interceptors.   These can be moved and positioned wherever they are needed.

It’s an expensive system.  Each battery costs about $50 million.  Each interceptor costs as much as $100,000.   

Here’s how it is designed to work.

The detection and tracking unit uses radar to scan a defined area for any incoming short- to medium-range rockets, that is, coming from up to about 43 miles away.  A separate control unit consists of computers and other high-tech instruments that quickly analyze the radar’s data. 

“The Iron Dome is very clever, in that its radar can see a rocket coming and very quickly calculate whether that rocket will be landing in a populated area and could threaten life,” Binnie said.  “It makes those calculations in a matter of seconds and launches the intercept at anything it determines is a threat.”

Defining ‘success’

Here’s where things can get tricky, says Theodore Postol, a physicist and missile-defense expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  In order to be effective, the interceptor has to be able to hit the incoming rocket head-on and destroy the actual warhead, i.e., explosive material loaded onto its front tip.

“The only way the Iron Dome interceptor can tell where the front of the artillery rocket is by illumination,” Postol said.  “A ‘laser fuse’ projects a set of light beams toward the artillery rocket, which reflects light.” 

Theodore A. PostolTheodore A. Postol
x
Theodore A. Postol
Theodore A. Postol

After a slight delay, says Postol, the Iron Dome interceptor detonates a cylindrical-shaped bomb comprised of multiple rods.  These should disperse into blow fragments into both the incoming rocket and its warhead, destroying both.

But a lot can go wrong during that delay between detonation and impact, says Postol.  By examining the “contrails”—those plumes of smoke in the sky seen in videos of Iron Dome interceptions from 2012 on through to recent weeks—he and other scientists say that Iron Dome misses the mark more often than not.

“The rocket will still go on to the ground and the warhead will still explode,” he said.  “So the only meaningful definition of ‘intercept’ in this circumstance is destruction of the warhead.  And sometimes people have incorrectly argued that if they hit the incoming artillery rocket, they divert it.  But that’s also not true.” 

“The Iron Dome success rate is roughly 90 percent,” said Israeli Defense Force spokeswoman Libby Weiss in an email.

But it’s hard to tell what that figure actually means. Has Iron Dome destroyed the warheads of 90 percent of the rockets Hamas has fired?  Or has the defense system merely intercepted the rockets without destroying the warheads?

VOA posed that question to Weiss.

“The Iron Dome Air Defense system has been incredibly successful in preventing death and unimaginable destruction all over Israel,” was her emailed reply.  “Hamas is launching rockets with the goal of terrorizing and targeting Israel's civilian population and Iron Dome has played a central role in safeguarding Israel's civilians.”

Postol says that he believes the interception rate could be more like 5 percent, and he says he should know.

“Remember, I was the guy who showed that the 96 percent intercept rate claimed for the Patriot missile in the Gulf War of 1991 was instead probably zero, and pretty much everybody now accepts that finding,” he said.

If he is correct, how is it that only one Israeli has died?  

According to the Israeli Home Front website, the rockets being fired into Israel carry a relatively small amount of explosives which can damage buildings and injure people out in the open.  But thanks to a sophisticated civil defense system that includes shelters in every building and a sophisticated early warning system, Postol says most Israelis are able to quickly get out of harm’s way.

As for Binnie, he says Israel is “firing a very expensive system in order to intercept a very cheap threat,” adding, “It would be nice to have a lot more information so that people have a better idea of what’s going on here.”

You May Like

Egypt's Suez Canal Dreams Tempered by Continued Unrest

Seen as a potential driver of recovery, Cairo’s plan to expand waterway had been raising hopes to give country much needed economic boost More

Ebola Maternity Ward in Sierra Leone First of its Kind

Country already had one of world's highest maternal mortality rates before Ebola arrived, virus has added even more complications to health care More

Malaysia Flight 370 Disappearance Ruled Accident

Aircraft disappeared on March 8, 2014; with ruling, families of 239 passengers and crew can now seek compensation from airline More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: steve donato from: florida
July 22, 2014 2:31 PM
Jeremy Binnie said " Iron dome is a one of a kind system" But, is it not a COPY of the USA designed and built, Patriot Missile System which appeared before Iron Dome?


by: Not Again from: Canada
July 19, 2014 10:31 PM
In my opinion, Postol is arguing theoretical issues, which are good on paper; the facts are absolutely clear, if you look at the amount of destruction, in Israel, before Iron Dome, during the the last two wars Hamas started, and today with Iron Dome protecting Israel; the difference is like night and day. And when you compare the size, range, and quantity of missiles launched, by the Hamas terrorists, in this war, their third war on Israel, it further adds to the fact that Iron Dome is providing very a effective shield. Add it all up, and Postol is demonstrated to be talking, for the purpose of grabbing headlines..
Like any human built system, Iron Dome is not perfect, but it does provide a huge level of protection, compared to the situation Israel faced without Iron Dome.
Postol needs to look at the results on the ground, rather than just wrap himself in the calculations. Postol needs to investigate from the observed facts today, as compared to the observed facts in the last two wars.
From a regional perspective, Israel will need to field, at least, six times the number of anti-ballistic defensive systems, to in essence account for the numbers that Israel's enemies could potentialy launch. Based on current arsenal estimates, by the IDF/intel orgs from media rpts, the potential total numbers exceed 50,000+ projectiles. What is really required, is a system that can destroy the projectiles launched by terrorists, immediately upon launch, or before the projectiles' trajectory arches towards its destined path.
Bottom line, Iron Dome is clearly making a tremendous difference in shielding Israel and its civilians from terrorist attacks.


by: tom from: Texas
July 19, 2014 9:06 AM
Sounds like a lot of sour grapes from anti-Israeli people.


by: Decker from: Beer Sheva
July 18, 2014 1:46 AM
Trust me, it works

In Response

by: Abe Bird from: Brussles
July 18, 2014 2:25 PM
It started as conspiracy theory made by Mordechai Shefer, the Israeli engineer that lost his "Bell" Laiser project to "Iron Dome" as the first rocket system against missiles. .Shefer tried hard to spam of the "Iron Dome" and called Theodore A. Postol to help him. But other 300 engineers proved that the system works well, as we see actually in reality for at least 4 years. Let the conspirators hearts break!


by: Gene Murphy from: Northern California
July 17, 2014 4:51 PM
It's hard to hit a bullet with a bullet, Patriot missileers claimed the world but the only guarantee is/was the pieces fall back to earth

In Response

by: AbeBird from: Brussles
July 18, 2014 3:32 PM
The Patriot of 1991 was designed to tackle aircraft and not missiles. That's why they couldn't intercept any of the 39 Iraqi Scud B missiles that were shot against Israel in 1991 Gulf War. Only the later improved version, which Israel offered to the US was designed and affective to intercept medium and long range rockets/missiles. The improved Patriots are not effective against short range rockets that are used to terrorise Israel from Gaza.

In Response

by: Gerald O'Hare from: New Jersey, USA
July 17, 2014 6:57 PM
This is Patriot 2.0


by: scristaldi from: US
July 17, 2014 4:13 PM
Israel does not need financial help from the US. They are doing just fine by themselves.

It's time the US politicians stop funding the world and start taking the US budget and deficit down NOW.

In Response

by: heu from: UK
July 28, 2014 10:16 PM
Yet they keep on asking for money and never seems to be enough, don't they? How would you call that?


by: Awesome
July 17, 2014 4:03 PM
Why is American taxpayers money being spent on Israeli defense? Perhaps Israeli citizens should pay taxes to Uncle Sam in order to defend itself. The bottom line is Americans have no representation whatsoever is Israeli parliament. This is taxation without representation. Our forefathers must be turning in their graves. American media is deaf, dumb and blind when it comes to American involvement in Israel's affairs.


by: Bernie from: New Jersey
July 17, 2014 3:31 PM
Mr Postol knows nothing what he is talking about. He should stay in the classroom and read all about the successes of the
Iron Dome.

In Response

by: meanbill from: USA
July 18, 2014 12:44 AM
THE WISE MAN said it; .. If the Iron Dome missile defense system was so effective, why is Israel spending all that money using all those Iron Dome missile defense systems, fighter planes, rockets and missiles against the Gaza Hamas Palestinians, and calling up all those Israeli troops and reserve troops, tanks, artillery, and mobile missile launchers, for a ground attack, (against Hamas who only fires some rockets, and have some assault rifles, and RPGs)...... It's like Israel using a sledge hammer, to kill an ant, isn't it?


by: Ed Simonis from: Carmichael, CA
July 17, 2014 3:27 PM
As long as Israel keeps suppressing the Palestinian people, I don't want any of my tax dollars used to support Israel.
Israel must rescind their settlement scheme before we consider any kind of support....

In Response

by: Mike from: New York
July 17, 2014 11:28 PM
Israel is not suppressing the Palestinians, in fact Israel helps the Palestinian authority financially, they give them taxes collected in Israel for items brought in from the Palestinian territory, on top of that Israel provides work opportunity for tens of thousands Arabs living in Israel, Israel provides freedom of all kinds to the Arabs living in Israel including freedom of speech and most of all Israel NEVER initiates fighting, the Palestinians are the ones to initiate any sort of confrontation by launching rockets at innocent civilians.
To make a long story short Israel is the only democratic country in the middle east and the ONLY humanitarian country in the region.
Your money is being used for good cause, better than Obama wasting it on pet projects and a failed American economy.


by: Scott Hamlin from: Georgetown
July 17, 2014 3:26 PM
Actually the only thing "everybody accepts" ...or at least is likely to accept and assume...is that Postol is full of the stuff that comes out of the south side of a north bound mule.

Comments page of 2
    Next 

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Super Bowl Ads Compete for Eyes on TV, Webi
X
January 29, 2015 9:58 AM
Super Bowl Sunday (Feb. 1) is about more than just the NFL's American football championship and big parties to watch the game. Viewers also tune in for the world famous commercials that send Facebook and Twitter abuzz. Daniela Schrier reports on the social media rewards for America’s priciest advertising.
Video

Video Super Bowl Ads Compete for Eyes on TV, Web

Super Bowl Sunday (Feb. 1) is about more than just the NFL's American football championship and big parties to watch the game. Viewers also tune in for the world famous commercials that send Facebook and Twitter abuzz. Daniela Schrier reports on the social media rewards for America’s priciest advertising.
Video

Video Theologians Cast Doubt on Morality of Drone Strikes

In 2006, stirred by photos of U.S. soldiers mistreating Iraqi prisoners, a group of American faith leaders and academics launched the National Religious Campaign Against Torture. It played an important role in getting Congress to investigate, and the president to ban, torture. VOA's Jerome Socolovsky reports.
Video

Video Freedom on Decline Worldwide, Report Says

The state of global freedom declined for the ninth consecutive year in 2014, according to global watchdog Freedom House's annual report released Wednesday. VOA's William Gallo has more.
Video

Video As Ground Shifts, Obama Reviews Middle East Strategy

The death of Saudi Arabia’s king, the collapse of a U.S.-friendly government in Yemen and a problematic relationship with Israel’s leadership are presenting a new set of complications for the Obama administration and its Middle East policy. Not only is the U.S. leader dealing with adversaries in Iran, the Islamic State and al-Qaida, but he is now juggling trouble with traditional allies, as White House correspondent Luis Ramirez reports.
Video

Video MRI Seems to Help Diagnose Prostate Cancer, Preliminary Study Shows

Just as with mammography used to detect breast cancer, there's a lot of controversy about tests used to diagnose prostate cancer. Fortunately, a new study shows doctors may now have a more reliable way to diagnose prostate cancer for high risk patients. More from VOA's Carol Pearson.
Video

Video Smartphones About to Make Leap, Carry Basic Senses

Long-distance communication contains mostly sounds and pictures - for now. But scientists in Britain say they are close to creating additions for our smartphones that will make it possible to send taste, smell and even a basic touch. VOA’s George Putic reports.
Video

Video NASA Monitors Earth’s Vital Signs From Space

The U.S. space agency, NASA, is wrapping up its busiest 12-month period in more than a decade, with three missions launched in 2014 and two this month, one in early January and the fifth scheduled for January 29. As VOA’s Rosanne Skirble reports, the instruments being lifted into orbit are focused on Earth’s vital life support systems and how they are responding to a warmer planet.
Video

Video Saved By a Mistake - an Auschwitz Survivor's Story

Dagmar Lieblova was 14 when she arrived at Auschwitz in December 1943, along with her entire Czech Jewish family. All of them were to die there, but she was able to leave after several months due to a bureaucratic mix-up which saved her life. Now 85, with three children and six grandchildren, she says she has a feeling of victory. This report by Ahmad Wadiei and Farin Assemi, of RFE/RL's Radio Farda is narrated by RFE’s Raymond Furlong.

Circumventing Censorship

An Internet Primer for Healthy Web Habits

As surveillance and censoring technologies advance, so, too, do new tools for your computer or mobile device that help protect your privacy and break through Internet censorship.
More

All About America

AppleAndroid