News / Middle East

Israel Vows to Build in West Bank Site After Evicting Protesters

Israeli border police remove a Palestinian from an outpost of tents in an area known as E1, near Jerusalem, January 13, 2013.
Israeli border police remove a Palestinian from an outpost of tents in an area known as E1, near Jerusalem, January 13, 2013.
TEXT SIZE - +
Robert Berger

You May Like

North Korea Launches Short-Range Missiles into Sea

South's Defense Ministry says it detected two launches Saturday morning, followed by another in afternoon More

Scientists Race to Contain Malaria: New Discoveries, More Resistance

World Health Organization is warning about dire consequences if drug-resistant form of malaria spreads beyond southeast Asia More

Photogallery US: Russian Missile Shipments to Syria 'Very Unfortunate'

Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, says missiles will embolden Assad and prolong suffering in Syria More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 4
    Next 
by: Aurora from: Montana
January 14, 2013 9:40 PM
@ david lulas

The Golan Heights area is already inhabited by the Druze. It is part of the area of their homeland.


by: david lulasa from: tambua,hamisi,vihiga,keny
January 14, 2013 3:42 AM
to be good for something,palestine neighbours,inparticular jordan,will have to donate land to palestinians...instead of always inciting palestinians against israelis..if not,then golan heights should be the one being given to palestinians.


by: Josh Glahn from: USA
January 13, 2013 9:02 PM
Although Robert Berger has put a valiant effort into presenting this occurrence impartially, his failure to provide reasons for Israel’s actions is decidedly biased. Presenting only that the Israeli army disregarded the Supreme Court’s ruling ignores the fact that the Executive Branch has every right to evacuate the E1 for security purposes. The sparsely populated 12 miles between the Maale Adumim and Jerusalem poses a major threat to the 40,000 Israelis in the West Bank. This “encroachment” has the potential to save lives, where the only Palestinian objections are that one day there might be a city there. The whole land issue aside, Israel’s removing the Palestinian protesters from the construction sight was completely nonviolent. Compared to American policemen who pepper sprayed hundreds of nonviolent college students, the Palestinians’ treatment was exceedingly civil. Taking a wider perspective, the fact that Israel has the need for new development is indicative of its expanding economy and infrastructure that benefits and creates jobs for both sides of the conflict.


by: Pete from: Czech Republic
January 13, 2013 7:42 PM
Well, palestinians shouldn't start the war... They should be grateful for what they have and learn how to behave.. they did it themselves and their mad believe!


by: david from: ireland
January 13, 2013 6:37 PM
just goes to netenyahoo is a dictator


by: Chsp943 from: Home
January 13, 2013 6:36 PM
So our next war will be for the Jewish people also?


by: Scott from: USA
January 13, 2013 6:14 PM
The current Israel Government is doing everything wrong, they are not even trying to seek Peace but only Conflict and War, The World is changing it mind on Israel, If the Arabs go to war with Israel, Yes there will be some token of support, but not what they expect or want, Israel has very little time left, but not as much as they think for some Major changes to be made, Yes the spoiled bully is going to get kicked around. and it might be the best thing to happen, As a American View Point Israel is in Violation of the United Nation Repeatedly, that is strike one. Strike two China and Russia could very well tell us to back off and we would have to listen to china no one else is buying our notes, Strike three we been at war for over 10 years we have had enough and we have pressing bills to pay and we no longer have the funds to just go to war for the fun of it or support someone who is not seeking Peace.


by: Lenox from: London
January 13, 2013 5:58 PM
I find it absolutely shocking that Israel is allowed to occupy Palestinian land, while the world turn a blind eye, it is an utter disgrace, and surely should not be allow to continue.


by: Davdon
January 13, 2013 5:43 PM
More shame on the rogue state of Israel
They seem to have as much respect for domestic Law in evicting these peaceful protesters as they have for
International law


by: AF from: Chicago
January 13, 2013 5:39 PM
Why does the United States continue to do nothing more than say "Now, now, you really shouldn't" about settlements? If it reduced aid to Israel by an amount proportionate to new settlements and refusal to abandon existing settlements, that would carry a stronger message and actual consequences.

Seizing land by force and then settling on it is illegal according to international law. It is the equivalent of the United States deciding to "solve drug crime" by unilaterally invading Mexico, seizing lands on its borders, handing the land over to Americans who want to build on it, and then committing systemtic human rights violations on the Mexicans who remain in that land.

Comments page of 4
    Next