News / USA

White House Defends Stance on Libya Attack

TEXT SIZE - +
Kent Klein

You May Like

Russia Cracks Down on Gay Activism

Arrest of 30 activists coincided with first-ever gay rights rally in neighboring Ukraine, which was allowed by authorities, protected by police More

In Hong Kong, Beef Over Sammy Kitchen's 3D Cow

Much to the dismay of restaurant owner Sammy Yip, authorities have turned an inhospitable eye toward his giant cow looming over Queen's Road West More

Cambodian Documentary Wins Cannes Prize for Innovative Cinema

In 'The Missing Picture', Rithy Panh uses clay figurines to tell story of Khmer Rouge brutality More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Godwin from: Nigeria
October 11, 2012 7:08 AM
The White House as presently constituted is too weak to do anything for USA. The earlier allusion to film protest was an attempt by the White House to deceive the American populace, nay electorate, as usual 'because it is election year'. This is what you get from a weak foreign policy especially when the administration is grossly inexperienced and expert at manipulation of unemployment figures - compensating for July/August and dropping back figure to the starting point. Real progress would have been if the figures were lowered below what was inherited. BUT NO! Showing weakness on all fronts is not how to maintain America's leadership in the globe. Ronald Regan of blessed memory once said, "If you want peace prepare for war." But America has portrayed itself a toothless bulldog that Libyan terrorists felt so confident to take out US consulate at Benghazi. What a shame! Is this a sign of the audacity of hope? Or the Change that you need?


by: mark l. from: east tn
October 10, 2012 10:33 PM
where was the military?
one of the primary tasks of our medtterranean fleet is to protect our embassies. this attack took six hours, and the state dept was in communication with them as it occurrred. no one called the fleet? bring in the commanders of the fleet, and ask them if they knew what was happening, as it happened.
prepare to be shocked.


by: Grantman from: Atlanta
October 10, 2012 9:21 PM
Quote: "White House press secretary Jay Carney said Wednesday the administration’s description of last month’s assault has shifted because of updated information."

The White House had information within 24 hours that it was not a "spontaneous uprising against a [insert adjective] video but that it was a terrorist attack. Why did it take over a week for them to "shift because of updated information?"


by: Daniel Phelan
October 10, 2012 8:38 PM
I know we about to hear it coming from you all Republicans but really? Really Republicans? This is all you can come up with? The exploitation of the death of an honorable man; a man of country?

This was a terrible violent act by terrorist. They are to blame.

What are you saying Republicans? That we should invade Iraq? 4000 dead American soldiers among countless others!!?? Oppps! Wrong enemy!!

Are you saying that Republicans and GW Bush are responsible for letting 9/11 happen?

In Response

by: Grantman from: Atlanta
October 11, 2012 6:39 AM
Oh, good heavens, Daniel. Your entire reply, except for the truth that "this was a terrible violent act by terrorists and they are to blame" is an entire non-sequitur.

All I was asking is why, if the administration knew within 24 hours that this was a terrible violent act by terrorists, that they lied for the next week in public statements by both Jay Carney and Ambassador Rice.

This is not a Republican or a Democrat issue; this is an American issue and has nothing to do with Iraq.

In Response

by: David
October 11, 2012 2:07 AM
Nice strawman and obfuscation you built there Daniel. Care to address the lies of Obama, Clinton and the UN ambassador? Sorry, you are too busy playing cover 2 defense for the liars in the Dem party. By the way, Bush is no longer President, quit bringing him up, by the way, the American people are beginning to miss the competency of the Bush presidency everyday.

In Response

by: Hombre from: Sedona, Az
October 11, 2012 1:20 AM
Oh please, nobody's that dense. The Administration refused to provide adequate security, theAmbassador and three others died and the President, Sec of State, UN Ambassador, et al., lied about it for a week after the truth came out from other sources. The Libyans said their story was preposterous. Even to an Obot the "Bush defense" has to seem lame. So why use it?

In Response

by: Bob from: Twin Cities MN
October 11, 2012 12:25 AM
@ Daniel Phelan _ Actually, Daniel, what everyone with a sincere love of country should do is listen to the testimony from the hearing today. So far it shows a deep incompetence and an ongoing attitude of misplaced superiority and arrogance in the State Department. Nothing Nixon or Clinton or Bush did even comes close to the magnitude of this mismanaged security snafu. Heads should roll, starting with H Clinton and everyone who works for her. The political exploitation is on the part of the Democrats as they even now continue to lie about the protocols and what they knew. Just check out the testimony.

In Response

by: Four Gees from: Reality
October 10, 2012 11:11 PM
Sorry Mr. Phelan, but the time for partisanship is over. The issue is not whether Rs or Ds want to go to war or avoid going to war. What is at issue is the lack of appropriate response by the current administration to a a series of orchestrated terrorist attacks on US embassies. No more smoke and mirrors from any politician - surely even you can understand that.

In Response

by: Hugh Blomeke from: Annapolis, Md
October 10, 2012 10:43 PM
If you're going to add a response, at least try to make it a coherent one. You might also try to read and understand the point of the article which has prompted your wide-eyed reaction. Of course terrorist are to blame for the attack. It's the Obama administration which is responsible for leaving the consulate and four now dead Americans vulnerable to the terrorist attack. Iraq? George Bush? American soldiers?. . . . huh? Just what connection do you see to the incompetance, dishonesty and dereliction of duty by your president and foolish administration?

In Response

by: Tom from: Ohio
October 10, 2012 9:30 PM
Hey, waitaminute - I thought this was caused by otherwise peaceful Muslims that were offended by some obscure video made by some two-bit producer. You Obamabots really need to stick to one story.

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video Volunteers Help Revive LA's Concrete River

The Los Angeles River is a concrete drainage channel through much of its 80-kilometer length. It channels waste-water from storm drains and has become a receptacle for much of the city's trash. But as Mike O'Sullivan reports, the river is slowly being restored with the help of volunteers, who take part in an annual clean-up.