News

NATO: Stress, Not Taliban, Drive Afghan Insider Attacks

Afghan policemen guard main gate of joint civilian-military base where two British soldiers, part of the NATO forces, were killed, Lashkar Gah, Helmand province, Afghanistan, March 26, 2012.
Afghan policemen guard main gate of joint civilian-military base where two British soldiers, part of the NATO forces, were killed, Lashkar Gah, Helmand province, Afghanistan, March 26, 2012.
Brian Padden

The NATO force in Afghanistan said Monday that attacks by Afghan security personnel on their Western counterparts, while few in a number, have had a disproportionately large effect on troop morale.

NATO says 17 members of the international coalition have been killed in 10 attacks by their Afghan counterparts since January 1. A similar number of Afghan forces have also been killed by fellow Afghan soldiers or police.

The coalition also disputes Taliban claims of responsibility for the attacks.

Brigadier General Carsten Jacobson, coalition spokesman, says the number of attacks is actually quite low given that there are 130,000 NATO troops and 350,000 Afghan forces often training together in close quarters. But he says each incident has a disproportional effect, increasing mistrust between Afghan and international forces.

"Although the incidents are small in number we are aware on the gravity they have as an effect on morale," he said. "So therefore we are very carefully looking at every single incident."

Last week three coalition troops -- two British and one American -- were killed by Afghan security forces in different parts of the country. Also in Paktika province last week, Afghan officials said a member of an Afghan militia drugged his colleagues and killed at least nine of them as they slept.

The Afghan Taliban often takes credit for attacks by members of the Afghan security forces, but General Jacobson says in almost every insider attack, the perpetrator was not affiliated with the insurgency.

"Our findings are that the vast majority lie in the individual," he said. "Personal grievances are one of the major causes, plus a number of other cause including stress syndromes on soldiers who are living in a country that has been [enduring] 30 years of war."

NATO is putting a new emphasis on established procedures such as background checks for Afghan recruits, while implementing new security measures such as placing intelligence agents among troops during basic training, and assigning soldiers to guard their colleagues while they sleep.

Security has also been stepped up following the recent killing of 17 Afghan civilians, purportedly by a U.S. soldier, and the inadvertent burning of Qurans at an American military base. The incidents have increased tensions between Afghan officials and the international coalition at a time when cooperation is vital as foreign troops begin withdrawing ahead of a 2014 deadline.

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Mike
April 08, 2012 8:31 AM
The sooner the U.S. leaves the sandbox the better, and our troops will no longer be targets for these "people" no matter who they are. We all know in our hearts what the future of the sandbox is, so who do we think we are fooling? Sometimes the political process leads to a really irrational situation and the unwillingness to admit the mistake leads to more mistakes. Vietnam is the best example.


by: f_moslim@yahoo.com
April 03, 2012 7:09 AM
killing of Nato troops in Afg is turning into a disaster Which is growing tremendously day by day. Resolving this problem, we gotta find out the roots. Many has turned a blind eye on a forgotten fact that afghan forces are getting disappointed by Nato actions reaching nowhere ending the 30-year-old war in Afghanistan. They consider their presence a game which goes nowhere except their countries ruining.


by: f_moslim@yahoo.com
April 03, 2012 4:23 AM
killing of Nato troops by ANSF is turning into a disaster Which is growing tremendously day by day. Resolving this problem, we gotta find out the roots. Many has turned a blind eye on a forgotten fact that afghan forces are getting disappointed by Nato actions reaching nowhere ending the 30-year-old war in Afghanistan. They consider their presence a game which goes nowhere except their countries ruining.


by: Haron
April 03, 2012 12:27 AM
till we stand on our feet or as federalic. US partnership is a must & indeed to be in Afghanistan until ten years if possible. if not possible at least five years are must. becuase they're 100% effectful for Taliban, Al-Qaeda obsolve. & NATO, ISAF & US have to finish Taliban to cut off the hands of Pakistan & Iran from our country.


by: Haron
April 03, 2012 12:08 AM
i see the situation of Afg is in crisis. when we see in Southern & Eastern Afghan forces are shooting the coalliation forces. from another side if this corruptful government doesn't sign strategic partenership with US. then it's an anguish for those who protect from girls & women where they go to schools, universities, environment jobs. & the president is responsible to sacrifices of Pakis & Iran.

Feature Story

An armed pro-Russian separatist stands guard as OSCE and members of a Malaysian air crash investigation team inspect the crash site of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, near the village of Rozsypne, Donetsk region on July 22, 2014.

Evolving Ukraine Crisis Tests Obama Foreign Policy

Downing of Malaysian jet over eastern Ukraine ramped up pressure on US - and EU - to act More