News

Nuclear Summit Produces Few Significant Outcomes

Indonesia's President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (L) speaks to President Barack Obama during the Nuclear Security Summit at the Convention and Exhibition Center in Seoul, March 27, 2012.
Indonesia's President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (L) speaks to President Barack Obama during the Nuclear Security Summit at the Convention and Exhibition Center in Seoul, March 27, 2012.

President Barack Obama on Tuesday sat with the leaders of China, India, Russia and top officials from nearly 50 other countries to try to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorism at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea.

The conference, overshadowed by concerns about North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile activities, shied away from expanding its mandate to call for concrete steps toward ridding the world of atomic weapons.

But host South Korea defended the summit, saying it did “yield practical outcomes to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorism.”  Analysts, however, describe the actual results modest and note that nothing binding was adopted.

Italy pledged to rid itself of all fissile material. The United States joined Belgium, France and the Netherlands in a deal to begin producing, four years from now, medical isotopes without the use of highly enriched uranium.

Several countries agreed to switch to low enriched uranium, which cannot be weaponized, to fuel research reactors.

But beyond that, there are few outcomes contributing to the summit's goal of securing vulnerable nuclear materials around the world.

The communique issued at the end of the summit does not mention North Korea nor Iran -- two countries are at the forefront of current concerns when it comes to suspected development of nuclear weapons.

With a North Korean launch of a ballistic missile likely just weeks away, President Obama and his counterparts discussed on the summit sidelines how to respond if Pyongyang goes ahead with what it contends will be a peaceful space launch.

While North Korea was not on the agenda, the summit's participants did effectively speak with one voice regarding Pyongyang, South Korea's Unification Minister Yu Woo-ik said.

Yu, who coordinates Seoul's policy towards North Korea, said the leaders attending the summit clearly articulated requests for Pyongyang to drop its plan for the mid-April launch.

The summit's host, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, said it is inappropriate for the North to pursue such projects while its own people have so little. The launch, he said, will only further isolate Pyongyang from the international community.

North Korea's foreign ministry, in a statement Tuesday, defended its planned launch, contending it should not be seen as a violation of sanctions forbidding it from the use of ballistic missile technology.

Pyongyang's statement said it “will never give up the satellite launch,” and that what it called "a peaceful activity" is a legitimate right of a sovereign state and essential for North Korea's economic development.

The impoverished and isolated country has twice before failed to place a satellite into orbit.

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Mervin
March 28, 2012 11:07 PM
The whole summit was just a lip service,no country will practise what they preach,e.g they preach to others about human rights yet in their countries and other countries they violate human beings to hell.


by: TW
March 27, 2012 5:25 PM
Typical yankee attitude like yours Godwin will be the destruction of human kind. So far up your pedestal and moral high horse, but yet in secret the yanks are no better than Iran or Nth. Korea as long as they support the real axis of evil which is Israel.


by: Godwin
March 27, 2012 7:56 AM
Truly the summit achieved nothing, instead it widened the scope and opened the door for other terror-prone countries like Nigeria to put forward a proposal to join the nuclear proliferation campaign. Shy to point out the threat Iran & N. Korea pose to world peace, shy to ask for reduction of existing warheads, shy to talk of a world free from nuclear threat, what is the objective of the Seoul nuclear summit? Proposing lower enrichment while Iran can go higher is passing supremacy to terrorism.

Feature Story

Warning sign on the Naharayim bridge spanning border of Israel and Jordan, north-eastern Israel, Oct. 22, 2014.

Jordan’s Battle With Islamic State Militants Carries Domestic Risks

Despite Western concerns that IS militants are preparing a Jordanian offensive, analysts call the kingdom's solid intel a strong deterrent More

Special Reports