USA Votes 2012

Obama, Romney Back on Campaign Trail

President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event at Cornell College, in Mt. Vernon, Iowa, October 17, 2012.
President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event at Cornell College, in Mt. Vernon, Iowa, October 17, 2012.
TEXT SIZE - +
Carla BabbPamela Dockins
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Godwin from: Nigeria
October 18, 2012 1:22 PM
From where did some of you get your facts to say Obama won 46% to Romney's 39%? Romney won discussion on economy 58% and foreign affairs 52%. These two were the pivotal issues in the last debate, so what other criteria applied? An insider deal thing? I'm worried about America's.
Well any way! my concern is that America needs a president who will defeat the enemy not one who will pally them. America's enemy is a sworn one, one under oath to destroy America that any measure put in place to win them over is a postponement of the evil day. It's like sitting on a keg of gunpowder. It needs just very little provocation to ignite it, like an amateur film, cartoon of one of their so-called prophets, or even such human rights matters like pallying with some party they consider their enemy. It is something you cannot bank on. You either subdue them or let them alone. Trying to win them over is suicidal. By my rating, Romney is more suitable for this job, for he understands who's America's friend and who's not.

In Response

by: Chuks
October 19, 2012 11:50 AM
From what you've said ''America needs a President who will defeat the enemy''. What has Obama done in that regard? When he was elected, he promised to make the World a better place by fighting and/or terminating the lives of high profile terrorists. Osama bin Laden was still alive when he made that promise, today he's no more and Al Qaeda as a group is currently being hunted. So when you say 'pallying'' with the enemy, it doesn't add up.
Meanwhile, Obama's view on terrorism is that America shouldn't spend excessively on endless wars rather the money should be saved and used to upgrade other sectors-education, health, etc


by: Chuks Ogbaga
October 17, 2012 5:25 PM
Having watched the two debates between rival candidates, I can say that I'm not interested in the quality of performance but realistic policies and a candidate who can tell not only the American people the truth but the global village. Romney seems to have some of his points wrong like when he criticised Obama for not responding to the attack on Libyan consulate quickly which was wrong, on the deficit-wrong as well and a whole bunch of issues. However, Romney may have a quicker solution to job creation having been in business for a long time. Americans should vote with their conscience.

In Response

by: Godwin from: Nigeria
October 18, 2012 11:53 AM
Chuka, please admit roundly that Romney is the man. He was not wrong in his criticism of Obama's handling of the 9/11 anniversary bombing in Libya. Instead he should be credited for being prompt to recognize that it was a terrorist attack while Obama prevaricated. You should also give to him that he knows better how not to launch America deeper into deficit, so he was right. Thanks for recognizing that he knows so well what to do to bring jobs back to Americans. That's a knock out. Romney is the man.

VOA Election Night TV Coverage

Loading
12:00:00 / -:--:--

More Election News

No records found for this widget:2883

More Articles

Poll Numbers

Loading...

Margin of error +/-2 percentage points