News

Senate Ignores Obama's Call to Cut Oil Tax Breaks

President Barack Obama urges Congress to eliminate tax breaks for oil and gas companies, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, March 29, 2012.
President Barack Obama urges Congress to eliminate tax breaks for oil and gas companies, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, March 29, 2012.
Kent Klein

U.S. Senators on Thursday voted down a bill to end $4 billion in tax breaks for oil companies, moments after President Barack Obama called on them to pass it. The president is putting his energy policy at the center of his re-election campaign.

The president began his address in the White House Rose Garden with a challenge to lawmakers.

“Members of Congress have a simple choice to make. They can stand with big oil companies or they can stand with the American people,” said Obama.

Shortly after the president spoke, the Senate failed to get the two-thirds majority needed to pass the bill. It was the third time that legislation to reduce the subsidies was voted down.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the president would continue his efforts to cut tax breaks for oil companies.

“Well, you can be sure he will not stop calling for this because we simply cannot afford it. And it makes zero sense to have the American taxpayers subsidize oil and gas companies that are enjoying record profits.”

Two Republicans voted to move the legislation forward, but four members of the president’s own Democratic Party voted against it.

The top Senate Republican, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said before the vote that the legislation would do nothing to ease gasoline prices.

“Faced with skyrocketing gas prices, Senate Democrats turned to a bill that even they admit does not lower them. And then to make matters worse, they blocked Republicans from offering anything that might,” said McConnell.

Republicans say that repealing the subsidies would be a tax increase on energy producers and would discourage the production of domestic oil.

Americans are concerned about the rising price of gasoline, and Obama is framing his proposal as a way to ease high fuel prices.

“It is like hitting the American people twice. You are already paying a premium at the pump right now. And on top of that, Congress, up until this point, has thought it was a good idea to send billions of dollars more of tax dollars to the oil industry,” said Obama.

And while the president wants to end tax breaks for the oil industry, he proposes more government help for alternative energy production.

“Investments in wind power and solar power and biofuels, in fuel-efficient cars and trucks and homes and buildings. That is the future. That is the only way we will break this cycle of high gas prices that happens year after year after year,” said Obama.

More than half of all Americans [54 percent] say they believe the president can do a great deal to affect gasoline prices, according to a recent CBS News/New York Times survey. But a recent Bloomberg poll shows that about two-thirds of those asked blame the oil companies and turmoil in the Middle East for rising prices.

One thing the president can do to affect fuel costs is to allow oil to be taken from the government’s strategic reserves. White House Spokesman Jay Carney said that has been discussed, but a decision has not been made.

“This is an option that remains on the table. A variety of other options remain on the table, something the president looks at. And I really do not have any other update on it for you,” said Carney.

Seven months before the presidential election, public opinion surveys show Obama’s small lead over Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is increasing. But the state of the economy - including the price of gasoline - still is the main concern of American voters.

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: djaymick
March 30, 2012 11:35 AM
Take a buck, spend a buck. The heck with the deficit. Why doesn't the media ask him why he doesn't support the Energy Freedom and Economic Prosperity Act? Republicans in the Senate offered this bill (to only be defeated) that would end all subsidies. The Democrats would never allow their green subsidies go away and they are unwilling to compromise to get what they want. It's all or nothing,


by: kenneth
March 30, 2012 9:32 AM
Does anyone know what subsidies the oil producers get? I have heard Obama claim that they have been getting them for more than 100 years. If true, that would pre-date the enactment of the income tax. If what he is talking about is the Depletion Allowance, then it is not a subsidy. Rather, it is similar to Depreciation, which allows companies to deduct the value of capital assets over their productive life, and is not unreasonable.


by: Walter
March 30, 2012 4:56 AM
It does not take a rocket scientist to see that someone is doing every thing they can to bring down this country and advance his Muslim brothers. Please wake up America and just realize that this great country is here because of our Constitution. Stand up and go vote in November elections. Throw all the bums out from city council seats, state elections and federal levels. We must take our country back one elected seat after another. Our struggle is a never ending fight that we cannot lose.

Feature Story

FILE - Dr. Felicity Hartnell, who is a clinical research fellow at Oxford University, holds a vial of an experimental vaccine against Ebola in Oxford, England, Sept. 17, 2014.

WHO: Ebola Vaccine Could Be in Use by January

Assistant director says that clinical trials of Ebola vaccines are underway or planned in Europe, United States, Africa More

Special Reports