News / Middle East

US, Allies Slam Iran Over Military Aid to Syria

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice at U.N. (Aug. 2012 photo)U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice at U.N. (Aug. 2012 photo)
x
U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice at U.N. (Aug. 2012 photo)
U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice at U.N. (Aug. 2012 photo)
TEXT SIZE - +
Margaret Besheer

You May Like

Experts Weigh In on Challenges of Closing Guantanamo Prison

Former chief military prosecutor at Guantanamo delivers petition to White House with more than 370,000 signatures, demanding facility be closed down immediately More

Karzai to Discuss Enhancing Defense Ties with India

Afghanistan looking for more military aid as it prepares for withdrawal of NATO forces by next year More

India, China Pledge to Overcome Border Tensions

Indian prime minister and Chinese premier attempt to move past tense standoff in the Himalayas during Delhi talks More

Burmese President Opens US Visit with VOA Town Hall Meeting

Ahead of his meeting with President Obama Monday, Thein Sein answered questions on human rights and economic development in his country More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Godwin from: Nigeria
September 21, 2012 12:45 PM
Iran is an outlaw regime. Iran will do everything to remain that way either knowingly or otherwise. And why not, Iran has no value for human life. That is why it is sponsoring terrorism everywhere, so what with sending weapons to Syria to kill more people than Ahmadinejad would have been able to kill using individual terrorists. On the issue of defying the big five over its nuclear ambition, Iran sees no one to fear out there any more. Britain is suffering down time, France is going aborrowing, USA has a weak president, China and Russia - the only two afloat - are on Iran's side. Someone please think of an alternative way forward. At the present and given the present dispensation of things, especially in the USA, Iran has no threat whatsoever, especially with Obama making sure that Israel doesn't go forward with its plan to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. This is Ahmadinejad's gambit.


by: LeRoy Padmore from: Jersey City,NJ
September 21, 2012 5:15 AM
Time is running out and what are we going to do?Ahamdinijad is a stubborn and a hard headed man.He need to understand that America her allied are not playing.we need to sent a message to Tehran.Tehran will not stop until she accomplish her goal.is there any man in the world to stop this non sense that the world is seeing?it is time that the UN and the rest of the world do something,it is at hand.they need to meet and discuss this issue,enough is enough.

In Response

by: Jake from: Ohio
September 25, 2012 7:12 PM
where is the outrage towards USA and its allies for supplying terrorists in Syria with weapons and destroying the country, just like how they "liberated" Libya. Your all a bunch of fools.


by: Beancube2010 from: Seattle WA
September 21, 2012 3:57 AM
Iranians have no option but to build defense. Even if they don't have nuclear weapons, Israel will try their best to drive us, the US, to attack Iran. Perhaps we may understand this much easier if we can imagine reverse their roles like we are backing Iran and pushing pressures on Israel uncompromisingly for over decades already. Too bad, our foreign policies are hijacked by .. you know who .. and we are now lesser cool to all those including Iranians, Israelis and Palestinians. Why should we be hijacked? After Britain failed their Middle East monopoly, they helped Israelis, instead of Palestinians and Iranians, bribed our political parties so they can keep some of their assets staying afloat.


by: Hasan Hussein from: Cincinnati
September 20, 2012 11:55 PM
Iran has the Right, granted by treaty, to enrich uranium.
"Massacre"? What about the foreign fighters that invade neighborhoods and murder its residents? Where did they get their weapons?
And how can you "massacre" a people "for a than year, now" and not run out of victims?
Iran "smuggling weapons"? To who? This is never explained.
And what are "illegal shipments"?


by: JCDavis from: USA
September 20, 2012 10:50 PM
A "U.N.-imposed arms embargo?" What is the number of the UN resolution imposing this supposed embargo?


by: Anonymous
September 20, 2012 6:46 PM
oh the humanitttttt... awwww shucks.... the hypocracy.... Pretty sure they won't publish this comment. LOL

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video US Oil Surge Could Impact Mideast Geopolitics

The United States will account for a third of new oil supplies over the next five years, and will become energy self-sufficient in 20 years, according to a new report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA). Although U.S. oil imports from Arab Gulf countries increased last year, analysts predict the U.S. will lose its dependence on Middle East imports, which is expected to have a huge impact on international relations and the balance of power. VOA's Henry Ridgewell reports.