News / Middle East

US Does Not Oppose Britain, France Arming Syrian Opposition

Syrian Opposition Coalition members and Syrian National Coalition members attend a meeting in Istanbul, March 18, 2013.
Syrian Opposition Coalition members and Syrian National Coalition members attend a meeting in Istanbul, March 18, 2013.
TEXT SIZE - +

You May Like

North Korea Launches Short-Range Missiles into Sea

South's Defense Ministry says it detected two launches Saturday morning, followed by another in afternoon More

Scientists Race to Contain Malaria: New Discoveries, More Resistance

World Health Organization is warning about dire consequences if drug-resistant form of malaria spreads beyond southeast Asia More

Photogallery US: Russian Missile Shipments to Syria 'Very Unfortunate'

Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, says missiles will embolden Assad and prolong suffering in Syria More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: mustafa from: pakistan
March 18, 2013 11:13 PM
I cannot understand why USA wants a change in leadership. Truely speaking USA wants a puppet Govt in Syria. USA wants a Govt Like SAUDIA,BAHRAIN,KUWAIT AND UAE. They cannot speak a single word against the will of USA. Saudi arab has no freedom of expression, even there is freedom of religion but why USA is keep quite. IS any body can explain.


by: NVO from: USA
March 18, 2013 9:34 PM
NEW WORLD ORDER rising, people, WAKE UP!! If its not PLANNED financial collapse, they will take you to WAR. Again, WAKE UP!!


by: Davis K. Thanjan from: New York
March 18, 2013 7:35 PM
If France and UK supply arms in addition to the US supply of so-called "non-lethal" armored vehicles and equipments will suffice the Syrian opposition forces to overthrow Assad. Is there any armored vehicles without arms in the US inventry?

In Response

by: Peace lover from: Peace world
March 19, 2013 12:10 AM
I think the Syrians will have to struggle for decades to rebuild the war torn country and who knows the next generation of the country will either oppose or not what the today's generation of Syrian is doing to the country. However, i wish the a bright future for the Syria. What does this little difference mean when you not supplying arms but permitting the other two flowers to arm the opposition while you being the leader. The play with words can not change the intention....Lets all pray for a long lasting peace worldwide.


by: Yvon from: USA
March 18, 2013 4:12 PM
The west no more help free Syria army, let them take care them self because of Terrorist and Kidnapped UN peace keepers. Who want to help who is terrorist too, and don't use tax Dollars to do that dirty job.


by: James North from: UK
March 18, 2013 10:09 AM
now that the "Syrian Opposition" has been exposed for the fraud it is - a subsidiary of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organization, I was hoping that we would moderate our enthusiasm trying to arm them... or maybe we have degenerated too far to the status of a third world Islamic state...???