News / Middle East

US Lawmaker Blames Iran for Cyber Attacks on US Banks

Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., leads a hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to assess current threats to the United States, on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 19, 2012.Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., leads a hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to assess current threats to the United States, on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 19, 2012.
x
Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., leads a hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to assess current threats to the United States, on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 19, 2012.
Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., leads a hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to assess current threats to the United States, on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 19, 2012.
TEXT SIZE - +
VOA News
The head of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee says he believes Iran is behind cyber attacks this week on U.S. banks.

In an interview with U.S. television network C-SPAN, Senator Joseph Lieberman of the eastern state of Connecticut said he thinks the disruptions of the websites of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America were carried out by Iran and its Quds Force, a unit of its elite Revolutionary Guards. He said he does not believe these were "just hackers."

Lieberman said he believes the attacks were a response to "increasingly strong" economic sanctions that the U.S. and its European allies have put on Iranian financial institutions.

The United States and several other Western countries have united to impose sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, which they suspect is aimed at developing nuclear weapons. Iran insists its uranium enrichment program is solely for peaceful purposes.

On Saturday, the U.S. Senate almost unanimously passed a non-binding resolution opposing Iran's development of atomic weapons.

The Senate passed the measure in a vote of 90 to 1.

The wording of the non-binding measure specifically states that the measure should not be interpreted as an authorization for the use of military force or a declaration of war.

Republican Senator Rand Paul of the southern state of Kentucky, who cast the lone "no" vote, has denounced the resolution as an excuse for the use of military force. 

The Obama administration has resisted Israeli calls to set a deadline for Iran to stop work on its nuclear program.

Israel sees a nuclear armed Iran as a threat to its existence, and refuses to rule out military action against Iranian nuclear sites.

Some information for this report was provided by Reuters.

You May Like

Doctors Without Borders Shuts Clinic in Northern Nigeria

Decision comes after five gunmen hijacked an aid vehicle on Saturday More

Experts Weigh In on Challenges of Closing Guantanamo Prison

Former chief military prosecutor at Guantanamo delivers petition to White House with more than 370,000 signatures, demanding facility be closed down immediately More

Karzai to Discuss Enhancing Defense Ties with India

Afghanistan looking for more military aid as it prepares for withdrawal of NATO forces by next year More

Burmese President Opens US Visit with VOA Town Hall Meeting

Ahead of his meeting with President Obama Monday, Thein Sein answered questions on human rights and economic development in his country More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: yooper2001 from: USA
September 23, 2012 10:29 PM
I cannot believe that USA does not have smart enough computer people to do the same to iran's banking system. what is good for the goose is good for the gander


by: matthew Slater
September 22, 2012 6:42 PM
I fail to see how what this hired warmonger says he believes constitutes news. This article is manufacturing consent. There's no evidence even offered that the banks were attacked. These are the most distrusted institutions on society that commit fraud and theft every day. War is their business model. This is obviously a false flag.


by: Bob from: U.S.
September 22, 2012 8:50 AM
We do not need more wars, we have had enough with Iraq and Afghanistan....if the sole purpose of this vote is to declare war again then it is wrong.

In Response

by: RnRdude from: Holland
September 22, 2012 12:41 PM
@Bob While its true that war should always be avoided however its not smart to let islamic radicals have nuclear weapons you know what islamic radicals did to the world trade center.. sticking your head in the sand does not make world problems go away.. some people should not get nuclear weapons..

Featured Videos

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Video

Video Calls Grow For An End to Sexual Assaults in US Military

A recent Pentagon report says the number of sexual assaults among people in the military continues to grow. The estimated number of incidents, ranging from groping to rape, increased by 37 percent last year. Both men and women were victims. This is prompting them, and activists, to push for deep changes in the US military. VOA Pentagon correspondent Luis Ramirez reports.