Accessibility links

Trump Executive Order on Vote Fraud Goes to Back Burner

  • Associated Press

FILE - President Donald Trump, shown speaking at the Department of Homeland Security in Washington, Jan. 25, 2017, said on Twitter that he wanted a voter fraud probe to look at "those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and even those registered to vote who are dead."

President Donald Trump's heated rush to launch what he said would be a "major investigation" into voter fraud has cooled, leaving White House staff uncertain when it will come to pass or what shape it will take.

An executive action commissioning the probe is still planned but could be several weeks away, two senior administration officials said Friday. Although Trump instructed staff to jump on the project last week, he has not discussed the issue in recent days, according to two other people in close touch with the president. All demanded anonymity to discuss private conservations.

Asked about the status of the effort, White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said: "I do not have an update at this time."

The indefinite delay came as some of Trump's advisers counseled him to abandon the idea, arguing it was a distraction from more pressing issues. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in last November's election. Trump won the Electoral College vote but lost the popular vote by nearly 2.9 million votes to Democrat Hillary Clinton.

FILE - A voter enters a booth at a polling place in Exeter, N.H., Nov. 8, 2016. Donald Trump won the presidency, even as he lost the popular vote to Democrat Hillary Clinton. He nonetheless tweeted on Nov. 26 that he won the popular vote. and alleged there was “serious voter fraud” in California, New Hampshire and Virginia. There’s no evidence to back up those claims.
FILE - A voter enters a booth at a polling place in Exeter, N.H., Nov. 8, 2016. Donald Trump won the presidency, even as he lost the popular vote to Democrat Hillary Clinton. He nonetheless tweeted on Nov. 26 that he won the popular vote. and alleged there was “serious voter fraud” in California, New Hampshire and Virginia. There’s no evidence to back up those claims.

Pushed aside

A senior official said the investigation, which Trump never publicly discussed in detail, has become less of a priority because it has been drowned out by other White House efforts, including attempts to manage the chaotic aftermath of Trump's executive order restricting immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations. The investigation most likely would not be considered until well after the confirmation of Trump's pick for attorney general, Republican U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the official said.

That would be a marked change from the breakneck pace by which the order was first introduced.

In his earliest days in office, Trump appeared to be fixated on the election results and frustrated by political opponents who questioned the legitimacy of his victory.

At his first meeting with lawmakers of both parties, he declared believed that 3 million to 5 million people had voted illegally in November, a widely debunked assertion that sent the White House scrambling to craft an order that met the president's wishes.

Two days later, Trump announced in a pair of tweets that a "major investigation" would look at those registered to vote in more than one state, "those who are illegal and ... even, those registered to vote who are dead (and many for a long time)." Depending on results, the Republican tweeted on his sixth day in office, "we will strengthen up voting procedures!"

A distraction

Several congressional Republicans decried the claim as a distraction, other executive orders were rescheduled and an administration set to roll out an ambitious first-week agenda found itself suddenly sidetracked.

White House staffers told reporters on the afternoon of January 26 that it was nearly time to be escorted into the Oval Office to watch Trump sign the order. But the photo-op was abruptly postponed. And now, though more than a week has passed, it has yet to be rescheduled and no timetable has been announced for its return.

The White House also abruptly canceled an executive action on cybersecurity this week, after briefing reporters on its text and putting the signing ceremony on the president's public schedule. That action has not yet been signed.

Trump's call for a probe alarmed Democrats, who already believe that efforts to tighten voter ID laws are a means to restrict access to the ballot box. And soon, members of Trump's own party suggested it was misguided.

FILE - House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, said that he saw no evidence of voter fraud in the 2016 election and that his committee wouldn't investigate it.
FILE - House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, said that he saw no evidence of voter fraud in the 2016 election and that his committee wouldn't investigate it.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, broke with Trump, saying that he saw no evidence of voter fraud in the 2016 election and that his committee wouldn't investigate it. He said Trump was free to order the Justice Department to investigate the issue, but that he was not interested in launching a congressional inquiry.

Vote 'was not tainted'

Trump's own attorneys dismissed claims of voter fraud in a legal filing late last year responding to Green Party candidate Jill Stein's demand for a recount in Michigan, a state Trump won. Referring to that outcome, the attorneys wrote: "All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake."

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said last week that a task force could be commissioned to focus on dead people who remained on voter rolls and people registered in two or more states. And he said it could center on "bigger" states where Trump didn't compete during the campaign, singling out California and New York, two Democratic strongholds.

No details have been released about the possible probe, including who would oversee it. One possibility would be Sessions, who has shown sympathy toward claims of vote fraud. He will most likely face a Senate confirmation vote next week. The president himself can't order a criminal investigation.

XS
SM
MD
LG